Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCCEX vs PFIPX
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts PCCEX vs PFIPX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R6
Price$11.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets588.47M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCCEX vs. PFIPX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCEX is a StrongBuy and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. PCCEX (588M). PCCEX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: PCCEX (3.37) vs PFIPX (2.47). PCCEX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: PCCEX (13 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCCEX (0.67). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PCCEX (0) and PFIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.05 vs. PCCEX (6.68). PCCEX (13.13) and PFIPX (12.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PCCEX | PFIPX | PCCEX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.483 | 8.452 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 588M | 2.24B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 2.47 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.68 | 7.05 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.41 | 28.89 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.13 | 12.93 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.81 | 31.18 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement