Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCCEX vs PFIPX
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts PCCEX vs PFIPX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R6
Price$11.06
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.03M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCCEX vs. PFIPX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCEX is a Buy and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. PCCEX (572M). PCCEX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: PCCEX (3.22) vs PFIPX (2.49). PCCEX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: PCCEX (13 years) vs PFIPX (18 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCCEX (0.67). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PCCEX (0) and PFIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.62 vs. PCCEX (6.96). PFIPX (13.15) and PCCEX (12.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PCCEX | PFIPX | PCCEX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.436 | 4.706 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 572M | 2.25B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 2.49 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 7.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.13 | 18.65 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.83 | 13.15 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.32 | 25.11 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement