Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCCEX vs PFIJX
PCCEX vs PFIJX Comparison
Open Charts PCCEX vs PFIJX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R6
Price$11.06
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.03M
Principal SAM Flexible Income J
Price$12.30
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
PCCEX vs PFIJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCCEX vs. PFIJX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCEX is a Buy and PFIJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIJX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. PCCEX (572M). PCCEX pays higher dividends than PFIJX: PCCEX (3.22) vs PFIJX (2.93). PCCEX was incepted earlier than PFIJX: PCCEX (13 years) vs PFIJX (18 years). PFIJX (0.85) is less costly to investors than PCCEX (0.67). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PFIJX (19.80). PCCEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFIJX: PCCEX (0) vs PFIJX (1000). PFIJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. PCCEX (6.96). PFIJX return over 5 years is better than : 15.49 vs. PCCEX (12.83).
| PCCEX | PFIJX | PCCEX / PFIJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.85 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.85 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.436 | 4.956 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 572M | 2.25B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 2.93 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 8.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.13 | 20.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.83 | 15.49 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.32 | 30.16 | 87% |