Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WWNPX
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WWNPX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$43.17
Change-$0.21 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.94B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$113.70
Change-$4.78 (-4.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WWNPX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 30.9B vs. WWNPX (1.01B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WWNPX (0.08). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). PCBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PCBIX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.52 vs. WWNPX (-20.35). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 127.39 vs. PCBIX (23.65).
| PCBIX | WWNPX | PCBIX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.670 | -11.503 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9B | 1.01B | 3,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.08 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.52 | -20.35 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.37 | 18.38 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.65 | 127.39 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.20 | 281.90 | 36% |