Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WWNPX
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WWNPX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$47.75
Change+$0.49 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.28B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$136.90
Change+$0.45 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WWNPX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a StrongBuy and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. WWNPX (1.31B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WWNPX (0.07). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PCBIX (24 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). PCBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PCBIX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.18 vs. PCBIX (15.68). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 215.95 vs. PCBIX (61.53).
| PCBIX | WWNPX | PCBIX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.135 | 2.256 | 316% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3B | 1.31B | 2,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.07 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.68 | 42.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.44 | 87.66 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.53 | 215.95 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.29 | 293.85 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers