Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WWNPX
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WWNPX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$47.05
Change+$0.35 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.04B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$126.72
Change+$2.48 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WWNPX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. WWNPX (1.16B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WWNPX (0.07). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). PCBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PCBIX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.70 vs. PCBIX (2.82). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 212.57 vs. PCBIX (50.47).
| PCBIX | WWNPX | PCBIX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.564 | -5.348 | -104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33B | 1.16B | 2,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.07 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 13.70 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.35 | 68.53 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.47 | 212.57 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.47 | 315.93 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement