Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WWNPX
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WWNPX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.20
Change-$0.72 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99B
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$128.68
Change-$3.39 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
PCBIX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WWNPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Buy and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. WWNPX (1.19B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WWNPX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WWNPX (0.07). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). PCBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PCBIX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.65 vs. WWNPX (-19.78). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 185.69 vs. PCBIX (33.05).
| PCBIX | WWNPX | PCBIX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.029 | -1.352 | -224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 1.19B | 2,700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.07 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.65 | -19.78 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.68 | 25.83 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | 185.69 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.81 | 309.40 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement