Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WMGCX
PCBIX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WMGCX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$41.56
Change-$4.83 (-10.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.47B
Nomura Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.86
Change-$3.06 (-17.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.56B
PCBIX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WMGCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Hold and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. WMGCX (3.56B). PCBIX (0.00) and WMGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . PCBIX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WMGCX (26 years). WMGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PCBIX (13.70). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: PCBIX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.93 vs. WMGCX (-16.47). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.21 vs. WMGCX (-51.77).
| PCBIX | WMGCX | PCBIX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.79 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.95 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.920 | 1.088 | -268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5B | 3.56B | 828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.93 | -16.47 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.90 | -24.30 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.21 | -51.77 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.71 | 1.36 | 9,141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers