Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WMGAX
PCBIX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WMGAX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.92
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.95B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth A
Price$26.38
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.17B
PCBIX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WMGAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Buy and WMGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. WMGAX (4.17B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WMGAX (0.00). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WMGAX (25 years). WMGAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: PCBIX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.65 vs. WMGAX (-7.60). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. WMGAX (-28.24).
| PCBIX | WMGAX | PCBIX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.04 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.20 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.029 | 5.016 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 4.17B | 768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.65 | -7.60 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.68 | -4.39 | -814% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | -28.24 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.81 | 25.20 | 444% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers