Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WMGAX
PCBIX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WMGAX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.23
Change-$0.19 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.51B
Nomura Mid Cap Growth A
Price$25.79
Change-$0.23 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
PCBIX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WMGAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Hold and WMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 31.5B vs. WMGAX (3.91B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WMGAX (0.00). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WMGAX (25 years). WMGAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: PCBIX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.72 vs. WMGAX (-11.31). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 28.55 vs. WMGAX (-33.31).
| PCBIX | WMGAX | PCBIX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.04 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.20 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.907 | 2.667 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.5B | 3.91B | 805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.72 | -11.31 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.03 | 2.54 | 1,298% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.55 | -33.31 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.44 | 19.56 | 518% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers