Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WFDRX
PCBIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WFDRX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.20
Change-$0.72 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.76
Change-$1.14 (-3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets902.57M
PCBIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. WFDRX (903M). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WFDRX (0.00). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.65 vs. WFDRX (-5.78). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. WFDRX (-31.74).
| PCBIX | WFDRX | PCBIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.79 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.82 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.029 | 7.245 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 903M | 3,544% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.65 | -5.78 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.68 | 30.79 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | -31.74 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.81 | 4.86 | 2,303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement