Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WFDRX
PCBIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WFDRX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$43.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.16B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$30.06
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets911.15M
PCBIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. WFDRX (911M). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WFDRX (0.00). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WFDRX (13 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.33 vs. WFDRX (-6.96). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.83 vs. WFDRX (-45.42).
| PCBIX | WFDRX | PCBIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.79 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.82 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.356 | -4.904 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.2B | 911M | 3,425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.33 | -6.96 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.90 | 25.83 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.83 | -45.42 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.45 | -0.33 | -33,311% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers