Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs WFDAX
PCBIX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs WFDAX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$43.52
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.16B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$23.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets911.15M
PCBIX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. WFDAX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Hold and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. WFDAX (911M). PCBIX pays higher dividends than WFDAX: PCBIX (0.12) vs WFDAX (0.00). PCBIX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PCBIX (25 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDAX: PCBIX (0) vs WFDAX (1000). PCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.33 vs. WFDAX (-10.51). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 21.83 vs. WFDAX (-51.64).
| PCBIX | WFDAX | PCBIX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.21 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.24 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.356 | -8.528 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.2B | 911M | 3,425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.33 | -10.51 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.90 | 18.16 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.83 | -51.64 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.45 | -17.55 | -629% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement