Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBIX vs TMDPX
PCBIX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts PCBIX vs TMDPX
Principal MidCap Institutional
Price$45.20
Change-$0.72 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.99B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$17.27
Change-$0.41 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.68B
PCBIX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBIX vs. TMDPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBIX is a Buy and TMDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. TMDPX (1.69B). PCBIX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: PCBIX (0.12) vs TMDPX (0.00). PCBIX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: PCBIX (25 years) vs TMDPX (21 years). TMDPX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PCBIX (0.67). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. PCBIX (10.50). PCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: PCBIX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). TMDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.17 vs. PCBIX (-4.65). PCBIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.05 vs. TMDPX (-17.96).
| PCBIX | TMDPX | PCBIX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.029 | 12.397 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 1.69B | 1,899% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.65 | -1.17 | 396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.68 | 25.39 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.05 | -17.96 | -184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.81 | -2.64 | -4,230% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement