Advertisement
PBSV vs PMCUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBSV is a Hold and PMCUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PBSV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PBSV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PMCUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PBSV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PBSV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PMCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PBSV (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +12.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
PBSV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-0.68% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| PBSV | PMCUF | PBSV / PMCUF | |
| Capitalization | 13.3M | 17.9B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -442.11K | 165M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 20.313 | 15.927 | 128% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.23 | 249.57 | 8% |
| Revenue | 9.19M | 213M | 4% |
| Total Cash | 10.7M | 209M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 71.4K | 2.26M | 3% |
PBSV | PMCUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PBSV's Valuation (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCUF (96). This means that PBSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBSV (100). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBSV’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBSV (91). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBSV’s over the last 12 months.
PBSV's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (64). This means that PBSV’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PBSV's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCUF (76). This means that PBSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
| PBSV | PMCUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 78% | 23 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 6 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
PBSV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PBSV and MFON have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBSV and MFON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBSV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBSV | 100% | N/A | ||
| MFON - PBSV | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZUKI - PBSV | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PONGF - PBSV | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PMCUF - PBSV | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PANHF - PBSV | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PMCUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMCUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMCUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OCLCF - PMCUF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMSNY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FSLY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| NEXXY - PMCUF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMNSF - PMCUF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||