PBSFY vs SGBAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBSFY is a Hold and SGBAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PBSFY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGBAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PBSFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SGBAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
PBSFY (@Broadcasting) experienced а -17.11% price change this week, while SGBAF (@Broadcasting) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64994.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
PBSFY is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (+1.19% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| PBSFY | SGBAF | PBSFY / SGBAF | |
| Capitalization | 1.1B | 1.83B | 60% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.044 | -41.600 | 41% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
PBSFY | SGBAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SGBAF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBSFY (95). This means that SGBAF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBSFY’s over the last 12 months.
SGBAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBSFY (100). This means that SGBAF’s stock grew similarly to PBSFY’s over the last 12 months.
PBSFY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBAF (95). This means that PBSFY’s stock grew similarly to SGBAF’s over the last 12 months.
PBSFY's Price Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SGBAF (92). This means that PBSFY’s stock grew similarly to SGBAF’s over the last 12 months.
PBSFY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGBAF (78). This means that PBSFY’s stock grew significantly faster than SGBAF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
PBSFY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PBSFY and ITVPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBSFY and ITVPY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBSFY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBSFY | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| ITVPY - PBSFY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| FJTNY - PBSFY | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FUBO - PBSFY | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
| TVAHF - PBSFY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PBSFF - PBSFY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SGBAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SGBAF and IHRT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGBAF and IHRT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGBAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGBAF | 100% | +7.99% | ||
| IHRT - SGBAF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SBSAA - SGBAF | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| TVAHF - SGBAF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PBSFY - SGBAF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| THDDY - SGBAF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||