PBMLF
Price
$0.71
Change
+$0.02 (+2.90%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.07M
PEMIF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBMLF vs PEMIF

Header iconPBMLF vs PEMIF Comparison
Open Charts PBMLF vs PEMIFBanner chart's image
Pacific Booker Minerals
Price$0.71
Change+$0.02 (+2.90%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.07M
Pure Energy Minerals
Price$0.12
Change-$0.01 (-7.69%)
Volume$65.56K
Capitalization4.43M
PBMLF vs PEMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBMLF vs. PEMIF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBMLF is a Buy and PEMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PBMLF: $0.71 vs. PEMIF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: PBMLF and PEMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBMLF: 9% vs. PEMIF: 207%
Market capitalization -- PBMLF: $12.07M vs. PEMIF: $4.43M
PBMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.07M. PEMIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePEMIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PBMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PEMIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBMLF is a better buy in the long-term than PEMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBMLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBMLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PEMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBMLF is a better buy in the short-term than PEMIF.

Price Growth

PBMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.16% price change this week, while PEMIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -12.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBMLF($12.1M) has a higher market cap than PEMIF($4.43M). PBMLF YTD gains are higher at: 94.612 vs. PEMIF (-39.425). PEMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -410.17K vs. PBMLF (-644.38K). PEMIF has more cash in the bank: 602K vs. PBMLF (90.2K). PEMIF has higher revenues than PBMLF: PEMIF (557K) vs PBMLF (0).
PBMLFPEMIFPBMLF / PEMIF
Capitalization12.1M4.43M273%
EBITDA-644.38K-410.17K157%
Gain YTD94.612-39.425-240%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0557K-
Total Cash90.2K602K15%
Total Debt92KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBMLF vs PEMIF: Fundamental Ratings
PBMLF
PEMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4691
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10068
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEMIF's Valuation (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (97). This means that PEMIF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PEMIF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMIF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PEMIF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PBMLF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEMIF (91). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEMIF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMIF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PEMIF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBMLFPEMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YSG9.390.60
+6.83%
Yatsen Holding Limited
MOGU2.490.07
+2.88%
MOGU
CRWV89.091.61
+1.84%
Coreweave Inc
GBTG8.11-0.03
-0.37%
Global Business Travel Group
MASS5.44-0.06
-1.09%
908 Devices

PBMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBMLF and ORRCF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBMLF and ORRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBMLF
1D Price
Change %
PBMLF100%
+2.16%
ORRCF - PBMLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
PEMIF - PBMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-8.39%
PEMSF - PBMLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.15%
PGEZF - PBMLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
PGXPF - PBMLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-6.78%
More

PEMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PEMIF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PEMIF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEMIF
1D Price
Change %
PEMIF100%
-8.39%
SLVDF - PEMIF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
LAC - PEMIF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
EEMMF - PEMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
ORRCF - PEMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
PGEZF - PEMIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
More