PBHC
Price
$15.10
Change
+$0.08 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
75.52M
SFBC
Price
$47.18
Change
+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
104.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBHC vs SFBC

Header iconPBHC vs SFBC Comparison
Open Charts PBHC vs SFBCBanner chart's image
Pathfinder Ban
Price$15.10
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
Volume$1.36K
Capitalization75.52M
Sound Financial Ban
Price$47.18
Change+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization104.11M
PBHC vs SFBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBHC vs. SFBC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBHC is a Hold and SFBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PBHC: $15.10 vs. SFBC: $47.18)
Brand notoriety: PBHC and SFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBHC: 22% vs. SFBC: 26%
Market capitalization -- PBHC: $75.52M vs. SFBC: $104.11M
PBHC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $75.52M. SFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $104.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PBHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBHC is a better buy in the long-term than SFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBC is a better buy in the short-term than PBHC.

Price Growth

PBHC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while SFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBC($104M) has a higher market cap than PBHC($75.5M). SFBC has higher P/E ratio than PBHC: SFBC (14.23) vs PBHC (7.85). SFBC YTD gains are higher at: -9.716 vs. PBHC (-12.618). SFBC has less debt than PBHC: SFBC (56.5M) vs PBHC (212M). PBHC has higher revenues than SFBC: PBHC (43.1M) vs SFBC (38.9M).
PBHCSFBCPBHC / SFBC
Capitalization75.5M104M73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.618-9.716130%
P/E Ratio7.8514.2355%
Revenue43.1M38.9M111%
Total Cash22.5MN/A-
Total Debt212M56.5M375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBHC vs SFBC: Fundamental Ratings
PBHC
SFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5031
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5616
SMR RATING
1..100
6565
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBHC's Valuation (36) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBHC (56) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBC's SMR Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PBHC (65) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFBC’s stock grew similarly to PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SFBC (22) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to SFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBHCSFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCHBF52.24N/A
N/A
COCA COLA HBC LTD
EXCOF5.15N/A
N/A
Exco Technologies Ltd.
DRPRY5.03-0.01
-0.20%
DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG
LCGMF0.14N/A
-0.71%
LION COPPER & GOLD CORP.
PEGRF6.76-0.15
-2.19%
Pennon Group PLC

PBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBHC has been loosely correlated with ANDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBHC jumps, then ANDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBHC
1D Price
Change %
PBHC100%
+0.53%
ANDC - PBHC
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PBAM - PBHC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
BOTJ - PBHC
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
SFBC - PBHC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
MVBF - PBHC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More

SFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFBC and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFBC and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBC
1D Price
Change %
SFBC100%
+0.15%
UBFO - SFBC
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
PBHC - SFBC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
HBCP - SFBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
AX - SFBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.07%
FCCO - SFBC
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More