PBAM
Price
$57.49
Change
+$0.29 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
333.75M
40 days until earnings call
SQCF
Price
$15.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
44.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBAM vs SQCF

Header iconPBAM vs SQCF Comparison
Open Charts PBAM vs SQCFBanner chart's image
Private Bancorp of America
Price$57.49
Change+$0.29 (+0.51%)
Volume$836
Capitalization333.75M
Susquehanna Community Financial
Price$15.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization44.75M
PBAM vs SQCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PBAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBAM vs. SQCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBAM is a Buy and SQCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PBAM: $57.49 vs. SQCF: $15.51)
Brand notoriety: PBAM and SQCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBAM: 21% vs. SQCF: 8%
Market capitalization -- PBAM: $333.75M vs. SQCF: $44.75M
PBAM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $333.75M. SQCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $44.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSQCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PBAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SQCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBAM is a better buy in the long-term than SQCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SQCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBAM is a better buy in the short-term than SQCF.

Price Growth

PBAM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.51% price change this week, while SQCF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBAM($334M) has a higher market cap than SQCF($44.8M). SQCF has higher P/E ratio than PBAM: SQCF (18.98) vs PBAM (8.15). SQCF YTD gains are higher at: 27.645 vs. PBAM (-0.433). SQCF has less debt than PBAM: SQCF (19.1M) vs PBAM (29M).
PBAMSQCFPBAM / SQCF
Capitalization334M44.8M746%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.43327.645-2%
P/E Ratio8.1518.9843%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt29M19.1M152%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBAM vs SQCF: Fundamental Ratings
PBAM
SQCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5049
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
471
SMR RATING
1..100
3455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBAM's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (47). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SQCF (71). This means that PBAM’s stock grew significantly faster than SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (55). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

SQCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as PBAM (52). This means that SQCF’s stock grew similarly to PBAM’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (24). This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBAMSQCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSNGY14.560.11
+0.76%
Hang Seng Bank Ltd.
KRNTY80.15N/A
N/A
Krones AG
SRRPF5.25N/A
N/A
Shagrir Group Veh Svcs Ltd
DTTLF3.46N/A
N/A
Datatec Ltd. S.A.
MVMDF0.01N/A
-9.82%
Mountain Valley MD Holdings Inc.

PBAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBAM and BOTJ have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBAM and BOTJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBAM
1D Price
Change %
PBAM100%
+0.50%
BOTJ - PBAM
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
SQCF - PBAM
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBHC - PBAM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
ANDC - PBAM
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
FNWD - PBAM
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More

SQCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SQCF and BOTJ have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQCF and BOTJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQCF
1D Price
Change %
SQCF100%
N/A
BOTJ - SQCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
PBAM - SQCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
AIBRF - SQCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
PBHC - SQCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
BPCGF - SQCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More