PBAM
Price
$60.85
Change
+$1.26 (+2.11%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
348.56M
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PBHC
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.84 (+6.91%)
Updated
Feb 4, 01:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBAM vs PBHC

Header iconPBAM vs PBHC Comparison
Open Charts PBAM vs PBHCBanner chart's image
Private Bancorp of America
Price$60.85
Change+$1.26 (+2.11%)
Volume$3.26K
Capitalization348.56M
Pathfinder Ban
Price$13.00
Change+$0.84 (+6.91%)
Volume$200
Capitalization75.16M
PBAM vs PBHC Comparison Chart in %
PBAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBAM vs. PBHC commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBAM is a Buy and PBHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (PBAM: $60.85 vs. PBHC: $12.16)
Brand notoriety: PBAM and PBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBAM: 46% vs. PBHC: 211%
Market capitalization -- PBAM: $348.56M vs. PBHC: $75.16M
PBAM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $348.56M. PBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $75.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBAM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PBAM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBAM is a better buy in the long-term than PBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PBHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBHC is a better buy in the short-term than PBAM.

Price Growth

PBAM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.42% price change this week, while PBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -14.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBAM is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBAM($349M) has a higher market cap than PBHC($75.2M). PBHC has higher P/E ratio than PBAM: PBHC (11.40) vs PBAM (8.79). PBAM YTD gains are higher at: 5.771 vs. PBHC (-13.215). PBAM has less debt than PBHC: PBAM (29M) vs PBHC (105M). PBAM has higher revenues than PBHC: PBAM (125M) vs PBHC (46.7M).
PBAMPBHCPBAM / PBHC
Capitalization349M75.2M464%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.771-13.215-44%
P/E Ratio8.7911.4077%
Revenue125M46.7M268%
Total CashN/A19.3M-
Total Debt29M105M28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBAM vs PBHC: Fundamental Ratings
PBAM
PBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2511
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
785
SMR RATING
1..100
3270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5375
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4899
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBAM's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as PBHC (36) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBHC (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PBAM’s stock grew significantly faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBHC (70) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PBAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as PBHC (75) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PBAM’s stock grew similarly to PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBAM's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBHC (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PBAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBAMPBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
33%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PBHC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBCOY16.080.37
+2.36%
Ebara Corp.
PRBZF70.391.44
+2.09%
Premium Brands Holding Corp.
ITFS2.150.04
+1.83%
ITAFOS INC.
CYSM17.70N/A
N/A
Community Bancorp of Santa Maria
CCCP0.10N/A
N/A
Crona Corp.

PBAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBAM and SQCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBAM and SQCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBAM
1D Price
Change %
PBAM100%
+0.66%
SQCF - PBAM
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBGPY - PBAM
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BANF - PBAM
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
PBHC - PBAM
20%
Poorly correlated
-11.11%
PCLB - PBAM
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More

PBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBHC and ANDC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBHC and ANDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBHC
1D Price
Change %
PBHC100%
-11.11%
ANDC - PBHC
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBBC - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAFN - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
HNVR - PBHC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
FUSB - PBHC
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More