PAZRF
Price
$2.99
Change
-$0.09 (-2.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
334.63M
RFNDF
Price
$1.28
Change
+$0.03 (+2.40%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
485.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAZRF vs RFNDF

Header iconPAZRF vs RFNDF Comparison
Open Charts PAZRF vs RFNDFBanner chart's image
Plaza Retail Reit Trust
Price$2.99
Change-$0.09 (-2.92%)
Volume$571
Capitalization334.63M
Rural Funds Group Stapled Securities
Price$1.28
Change+$0.03 (+2.40%)
Volume$120
Capitalization485.45M
PAZRF vs RFNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAZRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RFNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAZRF vs. RFNDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAZRF is a Hold and RFNDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PAZRF: $2.99 vs. RFNDF: $1.28)
Brand notoriety: PAZRF and RFNDF are both not notable
PAZRF represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while RFNDF is part of the Specialty Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAZRF: 54% vs. RFNDF: 11%
Market capitalization -- PAZRF: $334.63M vs. RFNDF: $485.45M
PAZRF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $334.63M. RFNDF’s [@Specialty Telecommunications] market capitalization is $485.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $92.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $14.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAZRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRFNDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAZRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RFNDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RFNDF is a better buy in the long-term than PAZRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAZRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RFNDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAZRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RFNDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RFNDF is a better buy in the short-term than PAZRF.

Price Growth

PAZRF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.61% price change this week, while RFNDF (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.25% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.50% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFNDF($485M) has a higher market cap than PAZRF($335M). RFNDF has higher P/E ratio than PAZRF: RFNDF (24.18) vs PAZRF (12.96). RFNDF YTD gains are higher at: 27.850 vs. PAZRF (21.388). RFNDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 88.7M vs. PAZRF (67.8M). PAZRF has higher revenues than RFNDF: PAZRF (124M) vs RFNDF (104M).
PAZRFRFNDFPAZRF / RFNDF
Capitalization335M485M69%
EBITDA67.8M88.7M76%
Gain YTD21.38827.85077%
P/E Ratio12.9624.1854%
Revenue124M104M119%
Total Cash8.61MN/A-
Total Debt684MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAZRF vs RFNDF: Fundamental Ratings
PAZRF
RFNDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
8187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
977
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2965

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RFNDF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as PAZRF (19). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to PAZRF’s over the last 12 months.

PAZRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (100). This means that PAZRF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

PAZRF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as RFNDF (87). This means that PAZRF’s stock grew similarly to RFNDF’s over the last 12 months.

RFNDF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PAZRF (50). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew similarly to PAZRF’s over the last 12 months.

RFNDF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAZRF (97). This means that RFNDF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAZRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAZRFRFNDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAZRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RFNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMGYX36.570.10
+0.27%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities I
FIFQX24.45-0.06
-0.24%
Fidelity Advisor Founders C
MTRIX20.06-0.05
-0.25%
MFS Total Return I
NRSRX53.21-0.34
-0.63%
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity R6
LSHAX26.46-0.94
-3.43%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv A

PAZRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PAZRF and RFNDF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAZRF and RFNDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAZRF
1D Price
Change %
PAZRF100%
-2.89%
RFNDF - PAZRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSRTF - PAZRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
SUI - PAZRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
ILPT - PAZRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
PRKWF - PAZRF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RFNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RFNDF and PAZRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RFNDF and PAZRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RFNDF
1D Price
Change %
RFNDF100%
N/A
PAZRF - RFNDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
EFRTF - RFNDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
BYLOF - RFNDF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
SEGXF - RFNDF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRKWF - RFNDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More