PAYS
Price
$5.25
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
285.87M
66 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$78.81
Change
+$1.54 (+1.99%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAYS vs QTWO

Header iconPAYS vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts PAYS vs QTWOBanner chart's image
Paysign
Price$5.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$752.5K
Capitalization285.87M
Q2 Holdings
Price$78.81
Change+$1.54 (+1.99%)
Volume$713.56K
Capitalization4.92B
PAYS vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAYS vs. QTWO commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAYS is a Hold and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PAYS: $5.25 vs. QTWO: $78.81)
Brand notoriety: PAYS and QTWO are both not notable
PAYS represents the Computer Communications, while QTWO is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAYS: 81% vs. QTWO: 92%
Market capitalization -- PAYS: $285.87M vs. QTWO: $4.92B
PAYS [@Computer Communications] is valued at $285.87M. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAYS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYS is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAYS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAYS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAYS is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

PAYS (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.35% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAYS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.92B) has a higher market cap than PAYS($286M). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than PAYS: QTWO (1313.50) vs PAYS (43.75). PAYS YTD gains are higher at: 73.841 vs. QTWO (-21.699). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 77.5M vs. PAYS (12.3M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. PAYS (11.8M). PAYS has less debt than QTWO: PAYS (2.72M) vs QTWO (539M). QTWO has higher revenues than PAYS: QTWO (743M) vs PAYS (68.5M).
PAYSQTWOPAYS / QTWO
Capitalization286M4.92B6%
EBITDA12.3M77.5M16%
Gain YTD73.841-21.699-340%
P/E Ratio43.751313.503%
Revenue68.5M743M9%
Total Cash11.8M532M2%
Total Debt2.72M539M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAYS vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
PAYS
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
38n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAYS's Valuation (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's SMR Rating (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (55) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAYSQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RERGX62.02N/A
N/A
American Funds EUPAC R6
TRSSX26.34N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Instl Small-Cap Stock
JDSAX24.19N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value A
SPWAX12.84N/A
N/A
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr A
IGIUX105.06-0.24
-0.23%
Integrity Growth & Income Fund C

PAYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYS has been loosely correlated with PDFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYS jumps, then PDFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYS
1D Price
Change %
PAYS100%
+0.19%
PDFS - PAYS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
DAY - PAYS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
QTWO - PAYS
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
AMPL - PAYS
37%
Loosely correlated
+4.96%
LAW - PAYS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+1.99%
FRSH - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
HUBS - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.00%
ALKT - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
RDVT - QTWO
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
More