PAYO
Price
$6.33
Change
-$0.06 (-0.94%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.3B
40 days until earnings call
TMNSF
Price
$79.63
Change
-$12.31 (-13.39%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAYO vs TMNSF

Header iconPAYO vs TMNSF Comparison
Open Charts PAYO vs TMNSFBanner chart's image
Payoneer Global
Price$6.33
Change-$0.06 (-0.94%)
Volume$314
Capitalization2.3B
Temenos AG
Price$79.63
Change-$12.31 (-13.39%)
Volume$2
Capitalization5.64B
PAYO vs TMNSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAYO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAYO vs. TMNSF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAYO is a Buy and TMNSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PAYO: $6.39 vs. TMNSF: $79.63)
Brand notoriety: PAYO and TMNSF are both not notable
PAYO represents the Computer Communications, while TMNSF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAYO: 76% vs. TMNSF: 1%
Market capitalization -- PAYO: $2.3B vs. TMNSF: $5.64B
PAYO [@Computer Communications] is valued at $2.3B. TMNSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAYO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMNSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAYO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMNSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMNSF is a better buy in the long-term than PAYO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAYO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMNSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAYO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMNSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMNSF is a better buy in the short-term than PAYO.

Price Growth

PAYO (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.77% price change this week, while TMNSF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +71.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAYO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.08% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (+0.02% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMNSF($5.64B) has a higher market cap than PAYO($2.3B). PAYO has higher P/E ratio than TMNSF: PAYO (25.56) vs TMNSF (18.96). TMNSF YTD gains are higher at: 12.032 vs. PAYO (-36.355). TMNSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 354M vs. PAYO (55.1M). PAYO has more cash in the bank: 497M vs. TMNSF (135M). PAYO has less debt than TMNSF: PAYO (45.9M) vs TMNSF (717M). TMNSF has higher revenues than PAYO: TMNSF (1.05B) vs PAYO (775M).
PAYOTMNSFPAYO / TMNSF
Capitalization2.3B5.64B41%
EBITDA55.1M354M16%
Gain YTD-36.35512.032-302%
P/E Ratio25.5618.96135%
Revenue775M1.05B74%
Total Cash497M135M368%
Total Debt45.9M717M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMNSF: Fundamental Ratings
TMNSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAYOTMNSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAYO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSCP20.67N/A
-0.02%
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corp Bd ETF
TSEC26.32-0.01
-0.04%
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
BGRN48.04-0.05
-0.11%
iShares USD Green Bond ETF
SZNE33.34-0.55
-1.63%
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Eq WghtSeasnlRottnETF
BTCI56.94-2.01
-3.41%
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

PAYO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYO has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYO jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYO
1D Price
Change %
PAYO100%
-1.24%
CPAY - PAYO
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
SHOP - PAYO
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
DT - PAYO
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
ALIT - PAYO
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
SEMR - PAYO
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
More

TMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMNSF has been loosely correlated with EB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMNSF jumps, then EB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMNSF
1D Price
Change %
TMNSF100%
N/A
EB - TMNSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
PAYO - TMNSF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
EVTC - TMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
IFBD - TMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
VASO - TMNSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.57%
More