PAYO
Price
$5.71
Change
+$0.05 (+0.88%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RAMP
Price
$29.90
Change
+$0.09 (+0.30%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.9B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAYO vs RAMP

Header iconPAYO vs RAMP Comparison
Open Charts PAYO vs RAMPBanner chart's image
Payoneer Global
Price$5.71
Change+$0.05 (+0.88%)
Volume$2.19M
Capitalization2.04B
LiveRamp Holdings
Price$29.90
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
Volume$190.63K
Capitalization1.9B
PAYO vs RAMP Comparison Chart in %
PAYO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RAMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAYO vs. RAMP commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAYO is a Buy and RAMP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PAYO: $5.71 vs. RAMP: $29.90)
Brand notoriety: PAYO and RAMP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAYO: 74% vs. RAMP: 33%
Market capitalization -- PAYO: $2.04B vs. RAMP: $1.9B
PAYO [@Computer Communications] is valued at $2.04B. RAMP’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $1.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.62T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAYO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRAMP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAYO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RAMP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYO is a better buy in the long-term than RAMP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAYO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAMP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAYO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RAMP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAYO is a better buy in the short-term than RAMP.

Price Growth

PAYO (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.55% price change this week, while RAMP (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAYO is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

RAMP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.32% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAYO($2.04B) has a higher market cap than RAMP($1.9B). RAMP has higher P/E ratio than PAYO: RAMP (51.55) vs PAYO (31.72). RAMP YTD gains are higher at: -1.548 vs. PAYO (-43.127). PAYO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. RAMP (63M). PAYO has more cash in the bank: 479M vs. RAMP (377M). RAMP has less debt than PAYO: RAMP (33.3M) vs PAYO (54.4M). PAYO (803M) and RAMP (779M) have equivalent revenues.
PAYORAMPPAYO / RAMP
Capitalization2.04B1.9B107%
EBITDA124M63M197%
Gain YTD-43.127-1.5482,787%
P/E Ratio31.7251.5562%
Revenue803M779M103%
Total Cash479M377M127%
Total Debt54.4M33.3M163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RAMP: Fundamental Ratings
RAMP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAYORAMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAYO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RAMP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXBAX14.550.02
+0.14%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term S
OBEGX35.96-0.04
-0.11%
Oberweis Global Opportunities Investor
FSMLX28.16-0.09
-0.32%
Franklin Small Cap Growth R6
GSCTX12.24-0.05
-0.41%
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts C
STBIX515.32-6.16
-1.18%
State Street Equity 500 Index Svc

PAYO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYO has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYO jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYO
1D Price
Change %
PAYO100%
+0.88%
CPAY - PAYO
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
SHOP - PAYO
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
RAMP - PAYO
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
ZETA - PAYO
51%
Loosely correlated
+8.32%
FIVN - PAYO
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
More

RAMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RAMP has been closely correlated with FROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RAMP jumps, then FROG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RAMP
1D Price
Change %
RAMP100%
+0.30%
FROG - RAMP
67%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
FTNT - RAMP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
CPAY - RAMP
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
CRWD - RAMP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
IOT - RAMP
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More