It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAYD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAYD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRXXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
PAYD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while PRXXF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Electronics/Appliances (+0.17% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
PAYD | PRXXF | PAYD / PRXXF | |
Capitalization | 21.6M | 1.81B | 1% |
EBITDA | -301.39K | 1.42B | -0% |
Gain YTD | -11.333 | -6.914 | 164% |
P/E Ratio | 88.67 | 26.47 | 335% |
Revenue | 18.8M | 2.18B | 1% |
Total Cash | 751K | 1.5B | 0% |
Total Debt | 111K | 54.6M | 0% |
PAYD | PRXXF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAYD's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as PRXXF (98). This means that PAYD’s stock grew similarly to PRXXF’s over the last 12 months.
PAYD's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PRXXF (100). This means that PAYD’s stock grew similarly to PRXXF’s over the last 12 months.
PRXXF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAYD (80). This means that PRXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAYD’s over the last 12 months.
PAYD's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PRXXF (64). This means that PAYD’s stock grew similarly to PRXXF’s over the last 12 months.
PAYD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRXXF (93). This means that PAYD’s stock grew significantly faster than PRXXF’s over the last 12 months.
PAYD | PRXXF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago39% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago41% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago53% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago42% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago44% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PAYD and HPTO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAYD and HPTO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAYD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAYD | 100% | N/A | ||
HPTO - PAYD | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PTRRF - PAYD | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NXLLF - PAYD | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LFMD - PAYD | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.18% | ||
PLGGF - PAYD | 21% Poorly correlated | +18.91% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRXXF has been loosely correlated with RMDEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRXXF jumps, then RMDEF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRXXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PRXXF | 100% | N/A | ||
RMDEF - PRXXF | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
QH - PRXXF | 32% Poorly correlated | +16.93% | ||
KARO - PRXXF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
ROIUF - PRXXF | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PAYD - PRXXF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |