PAX
Price
$13.98
Change
-$0.29 (-2.03%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.28B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VINP
Price
$12.35
Change
-$0.25 (-1.98%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
801.31M
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAX vs VINP

Header iconPAX vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts PAX vs VINPBanner chart's image
Patria Investments
Price$13.98
Change-$0.29 (-2.03%)
Volume$46.8K
Capitalization2.28B
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$12.35
Change-$0.25 (-1.98%)
Volume$1.44K
Capitalization801.31M
PAX vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
PAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAX vs. VINP commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAX is a StrongBuy and VINP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (PAX: $14.27 vs. VINP: $12.60)
Brand notoriety: PAX and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAX: 288% vs. VINP: 122%
Market capitalization -- PAX: $2.28B vs. VINP: $801.31M
PAX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.28B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $801.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the long-term than PAX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than PAX.

Price Growth

PAX (@Investment Managers) experienced а -10.53% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

VINP is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.43% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.28B) has a higher market cap than VINP($801M). VINP has higher P/E ratio than PAX: VINP (30.07) vs PAX (21.12). VINP YTD gains are higher at: -3.374 vs. PAX (-10.195). VINP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 278M vs. PAX (170M). VINP has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. PAX (52.4M). PAX has less debt than VINP: PAX (171M) vs VINP (883M). VINP has higher revenues than PAX: VINP (665M) vs PAX (406M).
PAXVINPPAX / VINP
Capitalization2.28B801M284%
EBITDA170M278M61%
Gain YTD-10.195-3.374302%
P/E Ratio21.1230.0770%
Revenue406M665M61%
Total Cash52.4M1.67B3%
Total Debt171M883M19%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAXVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VINP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYUIX66.841.03
+1.57%
Rydex Utilities Inv
CSJAX66.380.15
+0.23%
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares A
GABSX48.11-0.09
-0.19%
Gabelli Small Cap Growth AAA
LGOFX29.22-0.11
-0.38%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F
CEIZX13.52-0.09
-0.66%
Manning & Napier Callodine Equity Inc Z

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
-4.48%
BN - PAX
66%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
CG - PAX
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
KKR - PAX
62%
Loosely correlated
-9.69%
OWL - PAX
61%
Loosely correlated
-9.76%
TPG - PAX
61%
Loosely correlated
-8.38%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-1.49%
BN - VINP
64%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
PAX - VINP
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.48%
BAM - VINP
57%
Loosely correlated
-6.68%
CRBG - VINP
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
SEIC - VINP
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.14%
More