PAX
Price
$13.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
5 days until earnings call
VINP
Price
$9.78
Change
-$0.10 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
607.7M
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAX vs VINP

Header iconPAX vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts PAX vs VINPBanner chart's image
Patria Investments
Price$13.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.2B
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$9.78
Change-$0.10 (-1.01%)
Volume$41.09K
Capitalization607.7M
PAX vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAX vs. VINP commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAX is a Hold and VINP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PAX: $13.53 vs. VINP: $9.78)
Brand notoriety: PAX and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAX: 0% vs. VINP: 83%
Market capitalization -- PAX: $2.2B vs. VINP: $607.7M
PAX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.2B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $607.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the long-term than VINP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than PAX.

Price Growth

PAX (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.45% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

VINP is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.2B) has a higher market cap than VINP($608M). PAX has higher P/E ratio than VINP: PAX (18.37) vs VINP (13.92). PAX YTD gains are higher at: 19.269 vs. VINP (0.200). VINP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 289M vs. PAX (143M). VINP has higher revenues than PAX: VINP (608M) vs PAX (307M).
PAXVINPPAX / VINP
Capitalization2.2B608M362%
EBITDA143M289M49%
Gain YTD19.2690.2009,629%
P/E Ratio18.3713.92132%
Revenue307M608M50%
Total Cash12.8MN/A-
Total Debt15.6MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAXVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSLSX40.810.38
+0.94%
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
PTSGX18.610.12
+0.65%
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Z
MCBVX29.640.17
+0.58%
MFS Mid Cap Value B
FNGDX17.300.09
+0.52%
Franklin Intl Growth C
TFEQX12.680.02
+0.16%
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Primary

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
N/A
BN - PAX
68%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
CG - PAX
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
OWL - PAX
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
APAM - PAX
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
SEIC - PAX
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-1.01%
PAX - VINP
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BN - VINP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
SEIC - VINP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
APAM - VINP
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
TROW - VINP
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More