Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAWZ vs TAN
PAWZ vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts PAWZ vs TAN
ProShares Pet Care ETF
Price$54.82
Change+$0.86 (+1.59%)
Volume$1.72K
Net Assets51.27M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$43.42
Change-$0.29 (-0.66%)
Volume$534.02K
Net Assets784.43M
PAWZ vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAWZ vs. TAN commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAWZ is a Hold and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 784M vs. PAWZ (51.3M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than PAWZ: TAN (31.099) vs PAWZ (1.311). PAWZ was incepted earlier than TAN: PAWZ (7 years) vs TAN (17 years). PAWZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). PAWZ has a higher turnover TAN (43.00) vs TAN (43.00).
| PAWZ | TAN | PAWZ / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 1.311 | 31.099 | 4% |
| Net Assets | 51.3M | 784M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.71 | 70% |
| Turnover | 72.00 | 43.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 0.81 | 0.40 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PAWZ | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 15 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PAWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PAWZ and IDXX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAWZ and IDXX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAWZ | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| IDXX - PAWZ | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
| WOOF - PAWZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.45% | ||
| FRPT - PAWZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| CHWY - PAWZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.51% | ||
| SPB - PAWZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.74% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with FSLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then FSLR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | +4.09% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +4.49% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 68% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||