Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAWZ vs TAN
PAWZ vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts PAWZ vs TAN
ProShares Pet Care ETF
Price$56.51
Change-$0.56 (-0.98%)
Volume$12.72K
Net Assets60.02M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$39.21
Change+$0.85 (+2.22%)
Volume$7K
Net Assets661.62M
PAWZ vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAWZ vs. TAN commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAWZ is a Hold and TAN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 662M vs. PAWZ (60M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than PAWZ: TAN (15.821) vs PAWZ (4.363). PAWZ was incepted earlier than TAN: PAWZ (7 years) vs TAN (17 years). PAWZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). PAWZ has a higher turnover TAN (43.00) vs TAN (43.00).
| PAWZ | TAN | PAWZ / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 4.363 | 15.821 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 60M | 662M | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.71 | 70% |
| Turnover | 72.00 | 43.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 0.81 | 0.48 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PAWZ | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 15 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PAWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAWZ has been loosely correlated with CHWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAWZ jumps, then CHWY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAWZ | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| CHWY - PAWZ | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| ELAN - PAWZ | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| TSCO - PAWZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| ODC - PAWZ | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| ZTS - PAWZ | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | +5.31% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 76% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +8.30% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||