Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAWAX vs RGAGX
PAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PAWAX vs RGAGX
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-Adv
Price$75.45
Change+$0.67 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.61B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
PAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAWAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAWAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. PAWAX (15.6B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: RGAGX (0.61) vs PAWAX (0.00). PAWAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PAWAX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.20 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: RGAGX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. PAWAX (2.36). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. PAWAX (22.94).
| PAWAX | RGAGX | PAWAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.30 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.30 | 350% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.555 | 11.348 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.6B | 323B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 11.27 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.80 | 60.98 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.94 | 51.38 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 89.12 | 81% |