Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAWAX vs RGAGX
PAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts PAWAX vs RGAGX
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-Adv
Price$80.31
Change+$0.35 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.7B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.77
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
PAWAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAWAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAWAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PAWAX (16.7B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: RGAGX (0.59) vs PAWAX (0.00). PAWAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: PAWAX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.20 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: RGAGX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. PAWAX (6.98). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. PAWAX (22.82).
| PAWAX | RGAGX | PAWAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.30 | 350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.30 | 350% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.483 | 17.733 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 336B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.98 | 13.24 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.11 | 74.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.82 | 49.92 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.79 | 118.54 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement