PAVS
Price
$0.93
Change
+$0.20 (+27.40%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
62.75M
PIFMY
Price
$22.74
Change
-$0.29 (-1.26%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAVS vs PIFMY

Header iconPAVS vs PIFMY Comparison
Open Charts PAVS vs PIFMYBanner chart's image
Paranovus Entertainment Technology
Price$0.93
Change+$0.20 (+27.40%)
Volume$8.59K
Capitalization62.75M
PT Indofood Sukses Makmur TBK
Price$22.74
Change-$0.29 (-1.26%)
Volume$845
Capitalization4.01B
PAVS vs PIFMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAVS vs. PIFMY commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAVS is a Hold and PIFMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PAVS: $0.73 vs. PIFMY: $22.74)
Brand notoriety: PAVS and PIFMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAVS: 1765% vs. PIFMY: 153%
Market capitalization -- PAVS: $62.75M vs. PIFMY: $4.01B
PAVS [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $62.75M. PIFMY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAVS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIFMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIFMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIFMY is a better buy in the long-term than PAVS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAVS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIFMY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PIFMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAVS is a better buy in the short-term than PIFMY.

Price Growth

PAVS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while PIFMY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.65% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIFMY($4.01B) has a higher market cap than PAVS($62.8M). PIFMY has higher P/E ratio than PAVS: PIFMY (6.33) vs PAVS (1.78). PIFMY YTD gains are higher at: -0.544 vs. PAVS (-46.747). PAVS has less debt than PIFMY: PAVS (2.24M) vs PIFMY (71.29T).
PAVSPIFMYPAVS / PIFMY
Capitalization62.8M4.01B2%
EBITDAN/A24.21T-
Gain YTD-46.747-0.5448,598%
P/E Ratio1.786.3328%
RevenueN/A118.33T-
Total CashN/A51.84T-
Total Debt2.24M71.29T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAVS vs PIFMY: Fundamental Ratings
PAVS
PIFMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6178
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10061
SMR RATING
1..100
9111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIFMY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAVS (88). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew significantly faster than PAVS’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAVS (100). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAVS’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAVS (91). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew significantly faster than PAVS’s over the last 12 months.

PIFMY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as PAVS (92). This means that PIFMY’s stock grew similarly to PAVS’s over the last 12 months.

PAVS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PIFMY (87). This means that PAVS’s stock grew significantly faster than PIFMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAVSPIFMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATDRY2.570.02
+0.78%
Auto Trader Group Plc.
FFAI2.090.01
+0.48%
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc
KANKF24.90N/A
N/A
Kaneka Corp.
HLP0.66-0.02
-3.01%
Hongli Group
XTPT0.65-0.04
-5.83%
Xtra Energy Corp.

PAVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAVS has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAVS jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAVS
1D Price
Change %
PAVS100%
+5.58%
CHFLF - PAVS
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.00%
NAII - PAVS
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMY - PAVS
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
CFEIY - PAVS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPDNF - PAVS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PIFMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PIFMY and PAVS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PIFMY and PAVS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFMY
1D Price
Change %
PIFMY100%
-1.25%
PAVS - PIFMY
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.58%
SUEZY - PIFMY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORKLY - PIFMY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYF - PIFMY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMF - PIFMY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More