Advertisement
PATK vs SN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PATK is a Hold and SN is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PATK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PATK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PATK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PATK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PATK (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while SN (@Home Furnishings) price change was -0.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
PATK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
SN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Furnishings (-0.38% weekly)The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
| PATK | SN | PATK / SN | |
| Capitalization | 3.75B | 15.9B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 404M | 929M | 43% |
| Gain YTD | 37.148 | 15.941 | 233% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.25 | 27.87 | 116% |
| Revenue | 3.87B | 6.09B | 64% |
| Total Cash | 20.7M | 264M | 8% |
| Total Debt | 1.53B | 916M | 167% |
PATK | SN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PATK's Valuation (30) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SN (89) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SN’s over the last 12 months.
SN's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PATK (48) in the Building Products industry. This means that SN’s stock grew similarly to PATK’s over the last 12 months.
SN's SMR Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PATK (69) in the Building Products industry. This means that SN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PATK’s over the last 12 months.
SN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PATK (45) in the Building Products industry. This means that SN’s stock grew similarly to PATK’s over the last 12 months.
PATK's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for SN (82) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew significantly faster than SN’s over the last 12 months.
| PATK | SN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RWJ | 49.56 | 0.23 | +0.47% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | |||
| FGSM | 30.79 | 0.07 | +0.22% |
| Frontier Asset Global Small-Cap Equity ETF | |||
| XOVR | 20.51 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |||
| GFEB | 41.58 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| GSJY | 46.76 | -0.11 | -0.24% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Japan Eq ETF | |||
PATK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATK has been closely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PATK jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PATK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATK | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| MHK - PATK | 68% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| ETD - PATK | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| MLKN - PATK | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| HNI - PATK | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MBC - PATK | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
SN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SN has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SN jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.