PATH
Price
$12.28
Change
+$0.10 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jul 28, 01:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.9B
43 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$75.61
Change
+$0.79 (+1.06%)
Updated
Jul 28, 01:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.11B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PATH vs ZM

Header iconPATH vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts PATH vs ZMBanner chart's image
UiPath
Price$12.28
Change+$0.10 (+0.82%)
Volume$1.66K
Capitalization12.9B
Zoom Communications
Price$75.61
Change+$0.79 (+1.06%)
Volume$500
Capitalization20.11B
PATH vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PATH vs. ZM commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PATH is a StrongBuy and ZM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PATH: $12.18 vs. ZM: $74.82)
Brand notoriety: PATH: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PATH: 159% vs. ZM: 68%
Market capitalization -- PATH: $12.9B vs. ZM: $20.11B
PATH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.9B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PATH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PATH is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PATH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the short-term than PATH.

Price Growth

PATH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.26% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

PATH is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.98% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($20.1B) has a higher market cap than PATH($12.9B). PATH YTD gains are higher at: -4.170 vs. ZM (-8.320). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 630M vs. PATH (-142.12M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. PATH (1.88B). PATH has less debt than ZM: PATH (67.1M) vs ZM (73M). ZM has higher revenues than PATH: ZM (4.53B) vs PATH (1.31B).
PATHZMPATH / ZM
Capitalization12.9B20.1B64%
EBITDA-142.12M630M-23%
Gain YTD-4.170-8.32050%
P/E RatioN/A31.27-
Revenue1.31B4.53B29%
Total Cash1.88B6.96B27%
Total Debt67.1M73M92%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZM: Fundamental Ratings
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PATHZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QGRO110.520.78
+0.71%
American Century US Quality Growth ETF
NDIV28.970.09
+0.30%
Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF
SWZ6.22N/A
N/A
Total Return Securities Inc
OGSP10.07N/A
N/A
Obra High Grade Structured Products ETF
FINS12.95-0.05
-0.38%
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust

PATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATH has been loosely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATH jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PATH
1D Price
Change %
PATH100%
-1.14%
CRM - PATH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
ATEN - PATH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
PD - PATH
60%
Loosely correlated
+6.87%
GTLB - PATH
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
AMPL - PATH
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
-1.07%
PATH - ZM
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
HUBS - ZM
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
ADSK - ZM
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
RNG - ZM
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
CRM - ZM
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
More