PATH
Price
$10.45
Change
-$0.22 (-2.06%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.7B
29 days until earnings call
TMOAF
Price
$6.10
Change
+$0.90 (+17.31%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
733.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PATH vs TMOAF

Header iconPATH vs TMOAF Comparison
Open Charts PATH vs TMOAFBanner chart's image
UiPath
Price$10.45
Change-$0.22 (-2.06%)
Volume$157.32K
Capitalization5.7B
Tomtom
Price$6.10
Change+$0.90 (+17.31%)
Volume$168
Capitalization733.88M
PATH vs TMOAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PATH vs. TMOAF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PATH is a StrongBuy and TMOAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (PATH: $10.66 vs. TMOAF: $6.10)
Brand notoriety: PATH and TMOAF are both not notable
PATH represents the Computer Communications, while TMOAF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PATH: 82% vs. TMOAF: 124%
Market capitalization -- PATH: $5.7B vs. TMOAF: $733.88M
PATH [@Computer Communications] is valued at $5.7B. TMOAF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $733.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $338.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PATH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMOAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PATH and TMOAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PATH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMOAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TMOAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMOAF is a better buy in the short-term than PATH.

Price Growth

PATH (@Computer Communications) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while TMOAF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

PATH is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PATH($5.7B) has a higher market cap than TMOAF($734M). TMOAF YTD gains are higher at: 9.221 vs. PATH (-16.129). TMOAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.2M vs. PATH (-113.93M). PATH has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. TMOAF (267M). TMOAF has less debt than PATH: TMOAF (41.1M) vs PATH (79M). PATH has higher revenues than TMOAF: PATH (1.45B) vs TMOAF (570M).
PATHTMOAFPATH / TMOAF
Capitalization5.7B734M777%
EBITDA-113.93M38.2M-298%
Gain YTD-16.1299.221-175%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.45B570M255%
Total Cash1.56B267M582%
Total Debt79M41.1M192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMOAF: Fundamental Ratings
TMOAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PATHTMOAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMOAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRBAX28.070.34
+1.23%
JHancock Regional Bank A
FQUAX20.910.14
+0.67%
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
JMVPX35.040.16
+0.46%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R3
BINSX15.160.03
+0.20%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha I
IVGTX13.86N/A
N/A
VY® Morgan Stanley Global Franchise S

PATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATH has been loosely correlated with ATEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATH jumps, then ATEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PATH
1D Price
Change %
PATH100%
-2.47%
ATEN - PATH
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
CRM - PATH
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
GTLB - PATH
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
AMPL - PATH
59%
Loosely correlated
-8.49%
ADSK - PATH
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More

TMOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMOAF has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMOAF jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMOAF
1D Price
Change %
TMOAF100%
N/A
PATH - TMOAF
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
NTNX - TMOAF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
SFSVF - TMOAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MDB - TMOAF
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.20%
NOW - TMOAF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More