PATH
Price
$11.64
Change
+$0.06 (+0.52%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.9B
30 days until earnings call
TMOAF
Price
$4.45
Change
+$0.36 (+8.80%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
Ad is loading...

PATH vs TMOAF

Header iconPATH vs TMOAF Comparison
Open Charts PATH vs TMOAFBanner chart's image
UiPath
Price$11.64
Change+$0.06 (+0.52%)
Volume$45.85K
Capitalization12.9B
Tomtom
Price$4.45
Change+$0.36 (+8.80%)
Volume$405
Capitalization1.13B
PATH vs TMOAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PATH vs. TMOAF commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PATH is a Hold and TMOAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PATH: $11.59 vs. TMOAF: $4.45)
Brand notoriety: PATH and TMOAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PATH: 76% vs. TMOAF: 9%
Market capitalization -- PATH: $12.9B vs. TMOAF: $1.13B
PATH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $12.9B. TMOAF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PATH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMOAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMOAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PATH is a better buy in the long-term than TMOAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PATH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PATH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PATH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +10.91% price change this week, while TMOAF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +7.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

PATH is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+7.79% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PATH($12.9B) has a higher market cap than TMOAF($1.13B). PATH YTD gains are higher at: -8.812 vs. TMOAF (-20.322). TMOAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.5M vs. PATH (-142.12M). PATH has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. TMOAF (316M). TMOAF has less debt than PATH: TMOAF (50.2M) vs PATH (67.1M). PATH has higher revenues than TMOAF: PATH (1.31B) vs TMOAF (573M).
PATHTMOAFPATH / TMOAF
Capitalization12.9B1.13B1,140%
EBITDA-142.12M31.5M-451%
Gain YTD-8.812-20.32243%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.31B573M228%
Total Cash1.88B316M595%
Total Debt67.1M50.2M134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMOAF: Fundamental Ratings
TMOAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA284.9525.44
+9.80%
Tesla
GME27.460.38
+1.40%
GameStop Corp
SPY550.643.95
+0.72%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL209.280.91
+0.44%
Apple
BTC.X93754.840000-892.085940
-0.94%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

PATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATH has been loosely correlated with NTNX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATH jumps, then NTNX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PATH
1D Price
Change %
PATH100%
+2.39%
NTNX - PATH
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
BRZE - PATH
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
PD - PATH
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
NOW - PATH
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
DSGX - PATH
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

TMOAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMOAF has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMOAF jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMOAF
1D Price
Change %
TMOAF100%
N/A
PATH - TMOAF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
NTNX - TMOAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
SFSVF - TMOAF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MDB - TMOAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
NOW - TMOAF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
More