It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PANW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileZS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PANW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PANW (@Packaged Software) experienced а +4.46% price change this week, while ZS (@Packaged Software) price change was +8.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.91%.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
PANW | ZS | PANW / ZS | |
Capitalization | 90.2B | 28.8B | 313% |
EBITDA | 1.15B | -27.8M | -4,152% |
Gain YTD | 36.449 | -5.285 | -690% |
P/E Ratio | 43.23 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 7.53B | 1.9B | 397% |
Total Cash | 3.37B | 2.46B | 137% |
Total Debt | 2.18B | 1.23B | 177% |
PANW | ZS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZS's Valuation (72) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PANW (83) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ZS’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (51) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (14) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ZS (46) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.
PANW | ZS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 2 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been loosely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PANW | 100% | +1.09% | ||
ZS - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
AMPL - PANW | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
WK - PANW | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
S - PANW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
CRWD - PANW | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been loosely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.