Advertisement
PANW vs TTWO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANW is a StrongBuy and TTWO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PANW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PANW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PANW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
PANW (@Computer Communications) experienced а -9.41% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -13.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
PANW is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.
TTWO is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-0.31% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-1.46% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| PANW | TTWO | PANW / TTWO | |
| Capitalization | 116B | 39.2B | 296% |
| EBITDA | 1.99B | -2.54B | -78% |
| Gain YTD | -9.750 | -17.131 | 57% |
| P/E Ratio | 105.22 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 9.56B | 6.22B | 154% |
| Total Cash | 4.21B | 2.12B | 199% |
| Total Debt | 346M | 3.51B | 10% |
PANW | TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PANW's Valuation (86) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (91) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTWO (92) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (53) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (98) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (62) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (13) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.
| PANW | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 76% | 13 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XMMO | 142.70 | 1.17 | +0.83% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | |||
| SSPY | 90.48 | 0.10 | +0.12% |
| Stratified LargeCap Index ETF | |||
| RJMG | 27.59 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Raymond James Multicap Growth Equity ETF | |||
| DDFL | 20.60 | -0.04 | -0.19% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 15 Buf ETF -Jul | |||
| JUST | 97.92 | -0.88 | -0.89% |
| Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF | |||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -5.23% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 72% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 69% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.97% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||
TTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 100% | -4.35% | ||
| NET - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| COIN - TTWO | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.36% | ||
| PANW - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.54% | ||
| CLSK - TTWO | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||