PANW
Price
$200.71
Change
-$2.54 (-1.25%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
135.95B
50 days until earnings call
TTWO
Price
$244.13
Change
-$7.15 (-2.85%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.35B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PANW vs TTWO

Header iconPANW vs TTWO Comparison
Open Charts PANW vs TTWOBanner chart's image
Palo Alto Networks
Price$200.71
Change-$2.54 (-1.25%)
Volume$71.23K
Capitalization135.95B
Take-Two Interactive Software
Price$244.13
Change-$7.15 (-2.85%)
Volume$21.87K
Capitalization46.35B
PANW vs TTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PANW vs. TTWO commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANW is a Hold and TTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (PANW: $203.25 vs. TTWO: $251.28)
Brand notoriety: PANW and TTWO are both notable
PANW represents the Computer Communications, while TTWO is part of the Electronics/Appliances industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PANW: 76% vs. TTWO: 96%
Market capitalization -- PANW: $135.95B vs. TTWO: $46.35B
PANW [@Computer Communications] is valued at $135.95B. TTWO’s [@Electronics/Appliances] market capitalization is $46.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $12.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PANW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PANW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TTWO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than TTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PANW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PANW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTWO is a better buy in the short-term than PANW.

Price Growth

PANW (@Computer Communications) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while TTWO (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

TTWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.16% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Electronics/Appliances (+1.78% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($136B) has a higher market cap than TTWO($46.4B). TTWO YTD gains are higher at: 36.506 vs. PANW (11.700). PANW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.94B vs. TTWO (-2.87B). PANW has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. TTWO (2.04B). PANW has less debt than TTWO: PANW (338M) vs TTWO (3.51B). PANW has higher revenues than TTWO: PANW (9.22B) vs TTWO (5.8B).
PANWTTWOPANW / TTWO
Capitalization136B46.4B293%
EBITDA1.94B-2.87B-68%
Gain YTD11.70036.50632%
P/E Ratio127.03N/A-
Revenue9.22B5.8B159%
Total Cash2.9B2.04B143%
Total Debt338M3.51B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PANW vs TTWO: Fundamental Ratings
PANW
TTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1259
SMR RATING
1..100
5099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2918
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
613
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PANW's Valuation (88) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (98) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (59) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's SMR Rating (50) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTWO (99) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PANW (29) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as TTWO (13) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PANWTTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVLU33.290.30
+0.90%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Val ETF
XMAR39.16-0.01
-0.04%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Mar
FAX16.59-0.04
-0.21%
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund
SPHQ73.28-0.31
-0.42%
Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF
NVDG18.40-1.10
-5.64%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Nvda Daily ETF

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
-2.37%
ZS - PANW
70%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
CRWD - PANW
69%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
CYBR - PANW
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
FTNT - PANW
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
ADSK - PANW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More

TTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTWO
1D Price
Change %
TTWO100%
-0.14%
NET - TTWO
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
PANW - TTWO
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.37%
DOCS - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
SSNC - TTWO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
GDDY - TTWO
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.27%
More