PANHF
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.01 (-1.16%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.93B
PANW
Price
$179.76
Change
+$0.78 (+0.44%)
Updated
Apr 28, 10:59 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
90.22B
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PANHF vs PANW

Header iconPANHF vs PANW Comparison
Open Charts PANHF vs PANWBanner chart's image
Ping An Healthcare & Technology
Price$0.85
Change-$0.01 (-1.16%)
Volume$700
Capitalization2.93B
Palo Alto Networks
Price$179.76
Change+$0.78 (+0.44%)
Volume$4.18K
Capitalization90.22B
PANHF vs PANW Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PANHF vs. PANW commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANHF is a Hold and PANW is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PANHF: $0.85 vs. PANW: $178.98)
Brand notoriety: PANHF: Not notable vs. PANW: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PANHF: 99% vs. PANW: 66%
Market capitalization -- PANHF: $2.93B vs. PANW: $90.22B
PANHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.93B. PANW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $90.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PANHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PANHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PANW is a better buy in the long-term than PANHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PANW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PANHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PANW (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

PANW is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.57% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PANW($90.2B) has a higher market cap than PANHF($2.93B). PANHF YTD gains are higher at: 4.815 vs. PANW (-1.638). PANW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. PANHF (-406.4M). PANHF has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. PANW (3.37B). PANHF has less debt than PANW: PANHF (176M) vs PANW (2.18B). PANW has higher revenues than PANHF: PANW (7.53B) vs PANHF (6.16B).
PANHFPANWPANHF / PANW
Capitalization2.93B90.2B3%
EBITDA-406.4M1.15B-35%
Gain YTD4.815-1.638-294%
P/E RatioN/A43.23-
Revenue6.16B7.53B82%
Total Cash10.1B3.37B300%
Total Debt176M2.18B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PANHF vs PANW: Fundamental Ratings
PANHF
PANW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8614
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010
SMR RATING
1..100
2641
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
546
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PANHF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as PANW (84) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for PANHF (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than PANHF’s over the last 12 months.

PANHF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as PANW (41) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as PANHF (64) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to PANHF’s over the last 12 months.

PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANHF (54) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PANW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PANW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA284.9525.44
+9.80%
Tesla
GME27.460.38
+1.40%
GameStop Corp
SPY550.643.95
+0.72%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL209.280.91
+0.44%
Apple
BTC.X93754.840000-892.085940
-0.94%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

PANHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PANHF and AMPL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PANHF and AMPL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANHF
1D Price
Change %
PANHF100%
N/A
AMPL - PANHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
PANW - PANHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
TDOC - PANHF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
ATCH - PANHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
ADCOF - PANHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PANW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been loosely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANW
1D Price
Change %
PANW100%
+1.67%
ZS - PANW
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
CYBR - PANW
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
MSFT - PANW
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
SNPS - PANW
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
DOCN - PANW
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
More