PAMT
Price
$13.75
Change
+$0.37 (+2.77%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
299.66M
86 days until earnings call
ULH
Price
$30.11
Change
+$2.72 (+9.93%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
792.89M
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAMT vs ULH

Header iconPAMT vs ULH Comparison
Open Charts PAMT vs ULHBanner chart's image
Pamt
Price$13.75
Change+$0.37 (+2.77%)
Volume$6.32K
Capitalization299.66M
Universal Logistics Holdings
Price$30.11
Change+$2.72 (+9.93%)
Volume$57.71K
Capitalization792.89M
PAMT vs ULH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAMT vs. ULH commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMT is a Buy and ULH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PAMT: $13.75 vs. ULH: $30.11)
Brand notoriety: PAMT and ULH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucking industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAMT: 48% vs. ULH: 123%
Market capitalization -- PAMT: $299.66M vs. ULH: $792.89M
PAMT [@Trucking] is valued at $299.66M. ULH’s [@Trucking] market capitalization is $792.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucking] industry ranges from $35.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucking] industry is $4.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ULH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULH is a better buy in the long-term than PAMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ULH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULH is a better buy in the short-term than PAMT.

Price Growth

PAMT (@Trucking) experienced а +6.18% price change this week, while ULH (@Trucking) price change was +19.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was +5.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

ULH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucking (+5.21% weekly)

The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULH($793M) has a higher market cap than PAMT($300M). PAMT YTD gains are higher at: -16.056 vs. ULH (-33.916). ULH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 290M vs. PAMT (64.7M). PAMT has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. ULH (32.6M). PAMT has less debt than ULH: PAMT (309M) vs ULH (839M). ULH has higher revenues than PAMT: ULH (1.74B) vs PAMT (687M).
PAMTULHPAMT / ULH
Capitalization300M793M38%
EBITDA64.7M290M22%
Gain YTD-16.056-33.91647%
P/E RatioN/A13.03-
Revenue687M1.74B40%
Total Cash103M32.6M316%
Total Debt309M839M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAMT vs ULH: Fundamental Ratings
PAMT
ULH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
9358
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ULH's Valuation (35) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAMT (93). This means that ULH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ULH's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAMT (100). This means that ULH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ULH's SMR Rating (58) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAMT (93). This means that ULH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ULH's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as PAMT (62). This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to PAMT’s over the last 12 months.

PAMT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as ULH (22). This means that PAMT’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAMTULH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOGSF2.730.04
+1.49%
Emerald Oil & Gas NL
BWTL4.25N/A
N/A
Bowlin Travel Centers, Inc.
HOCPF136.00N/A
N/A
Hoya Corp.
KGFHF4.11N/A
N/A
Kingfisher plc
KMSWF0.05N/A
N/A
Kingmaker Footwear Holdings

PAMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAMT has been loosely correlated with MRTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAMT jumps, then MRTN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAMT
1D Price
Change %
PAMT100%
+2.77%
MRTN - PAMT
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
WERN - PAMT
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
CVLG - PAMT
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.05%
ULH - PAMT
40%
Loosely correlated
+9.93%
ARCB - PAMT
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
More

ULH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULH has been loosely correlated with CVLG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULH jumps, then CVLG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULH
1D Price
Change %
ULH100%
+9.93%
CVLG - ULH
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.05%
ARCB - ULH
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
MRTN - ULH
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
SNDR - ULH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
WERN - ULH
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More