PAMT
Price
$12.28
Change
+$0.11 (+0.90%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
256.97M
24 days until earnings call
ULH
Price
$23.50
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
618.75M
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAMT vs ULH

Header iconPAMT vs ULH Comparison
Open Charts PAMT vs ULHBanner chart's image
Pamt
Price$12.28
Change+$0.11 (+0.90%)
Volume$6.06K
Capitalization256.97M
Universal Logistics Holdings
Price$23.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$18.1K
Capitalization618.75M
PAMT vs ULH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAMT vs. ULH commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMT is a StrongBuy and ULH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PAMT: $12.28 vs. ULH: $23.50)
Brand notoriety: PAMT and ULH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucking industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAMT: 59% vs. ULH: 57%
Market capitalization -- PAMT: $256.97M vs. ULH: $618.75M
PAMT [@Trucking] is valued at $256.97M. ULH’s [@Trucking] market capitalization is $618.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucking] industry ranges from $29.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucking] industry is $3.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ULH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULH is a better buy in the long-term than PAMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAMT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAMT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ULH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAMT is a better buy in the short-term than ULH.

Price Growth

PAMT (@Trucking) experienced а -0.89% price change this week, while ULH (@Trucking) price change was -4.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was -5.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +79.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

ULH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucking (-5.66% weekly)

The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULH($619M) has a higher market cap than PAMT($257M). PAMT YTD gains are higher at: -25.031 vs. ULH (-48.217). ULH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 263M vs. PAMT (59.4M). PAMT has more cash in the bank: 117M vs. ULH (34.2M). PAMT has less debt than ULH: PAMT (331M) vs ULH (912M). ULH has higher revenues than PAMT: ULH (1.67B) vs PAMT (656M).
PAMTULHPAMT / ULH
Capitalization257M619M42%
EBITDA59.4M263M23%
Gain YTD-25.031-48.21752%
P/E RatioN/A10.17-
Revenue656M1.67B39%
Total Cash117M34.2M342%
Total Debt331M912M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAMT vs ULH: Fundamental Ratings
PAMT
ULH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
9572
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7885
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
130
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ULH's Valuation (28) in the Trucking industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAMT (93). This means that ULH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ULH's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as PAMT (100). This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to PAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ULH's SMR Rating (72) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as PAMT (95). This means that ULH’s stock grew similarly to PAMT’s over the last 12 months.

PAMT's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as ULH (85). This means that PAMT’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.

PAMT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Trucking industry is in the same range as ULH (30). This means that PAMT’s stock grew similarly to ULH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAMTULH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OEPSX64.751.51
+2.39%
Oil Equipment&Svcs UltraSector Pro Svc
JHERX20.260.19
+0.95%
JHancock Equity Income C
CILGX15.780.11
+0.70%
Clarkston Institutional
PXSGX27.890.19
+0.69%
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth I
CGFYX87.420.33
+0.38%
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 3

PAMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAMT has been loosely correlated with MRTN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAMT jumps, then MRTN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAMT
1D Price
Change %
PAMT100%
+0.90%
MRTN - PAMT
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
WERN - PAMT
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
SNDR - PAMT
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
ULH - PAMT
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
HTLD - PAMT
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More

ULH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULH has been loosely correlated with CVLG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULH jumps, then CVLG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULH
1D Price
Change %
ULH100%
-0.04%
CVLG - ULH
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
MRTN - ULH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
SNDR - ULH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
ARCB - ULH
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
WERN - ULH
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More