Ad is loading...
PAMCX vs WFDAX
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$83.85
Change-$4.47 (-5.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$22.05
Change-$1.54 (-6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. WFDAX commentary
Apr 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDAX (907M). PAMCX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PAMCX (25 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: WFDAX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.07 vs. WFDAX (-14.73). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.92 vs. WFDAX (-6.80).
| PAMCX | WFDAX | PAMCX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.21 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.24 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.003 | -14.136 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.07 | -14.73 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.72 | -18.18 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.92 | -6.80 | -454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.78 | -34.22 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...