Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs WFDAX
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$92.54
Change-$0.17 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.81B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$25.51
Change-$0.06 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.11M
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. WFDAX commentary
May 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a StrongBuy and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.8B vs. WFDAX (956M). PAMCX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PAMCX (25 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: WFDAX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). WFDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.95 vs. PAMCX (-8.70). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.39 vs. WFDAX (-21.31).
| PAMCX | WFDAX | PAMCX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.21 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.24 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.511 | -0.662 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8B | 956M | 2,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.70 | -3.95 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.04 | 27.61 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.39 | -21.31 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.14 | -25.69 | -59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement