Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs WFDAX
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$92.57
Change-$5.29 (-5.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$27.97
Change+$0.34 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets925.51M
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. WFDAX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WFDAX (926M). PAMCX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PAMCX (26 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: WFDAX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). WFDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.02 vs. PAMCX (-15.28). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -16.23 vs. WFDAX (-38.59).
| PAMCX | WFDAX | PAMCX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.21 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.24 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.479 | 7.593 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 926M | 2,765% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.28 | -8.02 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.81 | 33.35 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.23 | -38.59 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.49 | -0.75 | -4,175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers