Ad is loading...
PAMCX vs WFDAX
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs WFDAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.40
Change+$0.36 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.58B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$26.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
PAMCX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. WFDAX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Buy and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. WFDAX (1.07B). PAMCX (0.00) and WFDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PAMCX (25 years) vs WFDAX (17 years). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. PAMCX (21.70). WFDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: WFDAX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). WFDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.77 vs. PAMCX (2.97). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.06 vs. WFDAX (-18.46).
| PAMCX | WFDAX | PAMCX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.214 | 4.089 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.6B | 1.07B | 2,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.97 | 14.77 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.73 | -2.80 | 276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.06 | -18.46 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.40 | -13.16 | -246% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...