Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs TOECX
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs TOECX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$97.57
Change+$0.86 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth C
Price$40.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. TOECX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Buy and TOECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. TOECX (1.46B). PAMCX (0.00) and TOECX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than TOECX: PAMCX (26 years) vs TOECX (31 years). TOECX (2.05) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). TOECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX (2500) and TOECX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TOECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.64 vs. PAMCX (-10.85). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -12.01 vs. TOECX (-16.93).
| PAMCX | TOECX | PAMCX / TOECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.00 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.05 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.842 | 9.407 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 1.46B | 1,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.85 | -0.64 | 1,704% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.48 | 37.59 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.01 | -16.93 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.53 | -1.11 | -2,029% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement