Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs TOECX
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs TOECX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$97.33
Change+$0.26 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.36B
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth C
Price$41.16
Change+$0.22 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. TOECX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Buy and TOECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. TOECX (1.41B). PAMCX (0.00) and TOECX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than TOECX: PAMCX (25 years) vs TOECX (31 years). TOECX (2.05) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). TOECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX (2500) and TOECX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TOECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.22 vs. PAMCX (-1.68). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 1.05 vs. TOECX (-0.91).
| PAMCX | TOECX | PAMCX / TOECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.00 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.05 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.587 | 10.943 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 1.41B | 1,950% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.68 | 25.22 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.22 | 37.43 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.05 | -0.91 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.36 | 4.08 | 621% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement