Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs TOECX
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs TOECX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$95.83
Change+$0.10 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.37B
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth C
Price$40.02
Change-$0.05 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. TOECX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and TOECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. TOECX (1.37B). PAMCX (0.00) and TOECX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than TOECX: PAMCX (25 years) vs TOECX (31 years). TOECX (2.07) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). TOECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX (2500) and TOECX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TOECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 vs. PAMCX (-4.68). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.17 vs. TOECX (-4.78).
| PAMCX | TOECX | PAMCX / TOECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.00 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.07 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 7.871 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 1.37B | 1,999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.68 | 17.84 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.58 | 28.22 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.17 | -4.78 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.50 | -5.56 | -333% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement