Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs SMFYX
PAMCX vs SMFYX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs SMFYX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$95.49
Change-$1.30 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.86B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr Y
Price$42.04
Change-$1.02 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets726.98M
PAMCX vs SMFYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. SMFYX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and SMFYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. SMFYX (727M). PAMCX (0.00) and SMFYX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than SMFYX: PAMCX (26 years) vs SMFYX (14 years). PAMCX (1.01) and SMFYX (0.99) have similar cost to investors . SMFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFYX: PAMCX (2500) vs SMFYX (100000). SMFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. PAMCX (-9.58). SMFYX return over 5 years is better than : 27.66 vs. PAMCX (-8.85).
| PAMCX | SMFYX | PAMCX / SMFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.96 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.012 | 13.765 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 727M | 3,563% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.58 | 6.53 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.23 | 44.64 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.85 | 27.66 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.34 | 132.16 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers