Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs SMFCX
PAMCX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$97.57
Change+$0.86 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$30.06
Change+$0.31 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets745.57M
PAMCX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. SMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Buy and SMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. SMFCX (746M). PAMCX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: PAMCX (26 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: SMFCX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). SMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.04 vs. PAMCX (-10.85). SMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.75 vs. PAMCX (-12.01).
| PAMCX | SMFCX | PAMCX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.95 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.96 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.842 | 13.691 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 746M | 3,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.85 | 1.04 | -1,041% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.48 | 35.59 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.01 | 9.75 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.53 | 80.72 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement