Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs SMFCX
PAMCX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$90.88
Change-$5.74 (-5.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$20.81
Change-$9.48 (-31.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets672.25M
PAMCX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. SMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. SMFCX (672M). PAMCX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: PAMCX (26 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: SMFCX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.49 vs. SMFCX (-24.46). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -18.88 vs. SMFCX (-28.76).
| PAMCX | SMFCX | PAMCX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.95 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.96 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.154 | -0.526 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.1B | 672M | 3,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.49 | -24.46 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.98 | -5.71 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.88 | -28.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | 60.70 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement