Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs POAGX
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs POAGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$92.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
Price$51.02
Change-$0.09 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.76B
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. POAGX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and POAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. POAGX (6.76B). POAGX pays higher dividends than PAMCX: POAGX (0.02) vs PAMCX (0.00). PAMCX was incepted earlier than POAGX: PAMCX (26 years) vs POAGX (21 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than POAGX (0.66). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. POAGX (9.00). POAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: POAGX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). POAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.38 vs. PAMCX (-3.64). POAGX return over 5 years is better than : -5.23 vs. PAMCX (-15.22).
| PAMCX | POAGX | PAMCX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.682 | 15.770 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 6.76B | 379% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.64 | 12.38 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.56 | 42.14 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.22 | -5.23 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.67 | 54.35 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement