Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs POAGX
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs POAGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.14B
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
Price$53.88
Change-$0.17 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. POAGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and POAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. POAGX (6.63B). POAGX pays higher dividends than PAMCX: POAGX (0.02) vs PAMCX (0.00). PAMCX was incepted earlier than POAGX: PAMCX (26 years) vs POAGX (21 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than POAGX (0.66). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. POAGX (9.00). POAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: POAGX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). POAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.96 vs. PAMCX (-8.20). POAGX return over 5 years is better than : 6.03 vs. PAMCX (-6.56).
| PAMCX | POAGX | PAMCX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.256 | 22.260 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 6.63B | 394% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.20 | 12.96 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.07 | 42.34 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.56 | 6.03 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.83 | 65.00 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement