Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs PNOTX
PAMCX vs PNOTX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs PNOTX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
Putnam Sustainable Future R6
Price$21.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.88M
PAMCX vs PNOTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. PNOTX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and PNOTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. PNOTX (378M). PAMCX (0.00) and PNOTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than PNOTX: PAMCX (26 years) vs PNOTX (7 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than PNOTX (0.66). PNOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PNOTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: PNOTX (0) vs PAMCX (2500). PNOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.09 vs. PAMCX (-8.20). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.56 vs. PNOTX (-14.09).
| PAMCX | PNOTX | PAMCX / PNOTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.256 | 5.682 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 378M | 6,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.20 | -7.09 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.07 | 42.97 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.56 | -14.09 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers