Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMC vs XMHQ
PAMC vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts PAMC vs XMHQ
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
Price$48.02
Change-$0.05 (-0.10%)
Volume$677
Net Assets60.06M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$104.70
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
Volume$112.04K
Net Assets5.17B
PAMC vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMC vs. XMHQ commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMC is a Hold and XMHQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.17B vs. PAMC (60.1M). XMHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PAMC: XMHQ (6.840) vs PAMC (3.858). PAMC was incepted earlier than XMHQ: PAMC (6 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). XMHQ (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than PAMC (0.60). PAMC has a higher turnover XMHQ (58.00) vs XMHQ (58.00).
| PAMC | XMHQ | PAMC / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 3.858 | 6.840 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 60.1M | 5.17B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.25 | 240% |
| Turnover | 475.00 | 58.00 | 819% |
| Yield | 0.80 | 0.64 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PAMC | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PAMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAMC has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAMC jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAMC | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| BDC - PAMC | 81% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| EVR - PAMC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| JHG - PAMC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| SEIC - PAMC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| CG - PAMC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| OC - XMHQ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||