Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMC vs VXF
PAMC vs VXF Comparison
Open Charts PAMC vs VXF
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
Price$42.39
Change-$0.61 (-1.42%)
Volume$1.9K
Net Assets63.65M
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
Price$185.36
Change-$3.08 (-1.63%)
Volume$331.02K
Net Assets107.69B
PAMC vs VXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMC vs. VXF commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMC is a Hold and VXF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VXF has more net assets: 108B vs. PAMC (63.6M). VXF has a higher annual dividend yield than PAMC: VXF (-2.349) vs PAMC (-8.539). PAMC was incepted earlier than VXF: PAMC (5 years) vs VXF (23 years). VXF (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than PAMC (0.60). PAMC has a higher turnover VXF (11.00) vs VXF (11.00).
| PAMC | VXF | PAMC / VXF | |
| Gain YTD | -8.539 | -2.349 | 364% |
| Net Assets | 63.6M | 108B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.05 | 1,200% |
| Turnover | 367.00 | 11.00 | 3,336% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 1.21 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PAMC | VXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
PAMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAMC has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAMC jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAMC | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| EQH - PAMC | 81% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| JHG - PAMC | 81% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| JEF - PAMC | 80% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| CG - PAMC | 79% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| TNL - PAMC | 78% Closely correlated | -3.88% | ||
More | ||||
VXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VXF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VXF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VXF | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| APO - VXF | 72% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| KKR - VXF | 71% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| FERG - VXF | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| MRVL - VXF | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.52% | ||
| SNOW - VXF | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||