It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PALT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRAMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PALT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAMP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PALT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -37.68% price change this week, while RAMP (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.89%.
PALT is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.
RAMP is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
PALT | RAMP | PALT / RAMP | |
Capitalization | 28.2M | 2.28B | 1% |
EBITDA | -1.17M | 9.38M | -12% |
Gain YTD | 26.496 | -32.577 | -81% |
P/E Ratio | 14.12 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 11M | 636M | 2% |
Total Cash | 13.6M | 531M | 3% |
Total Debt | 77K | 44.1M | 0% |
PALT | RAMP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PALT's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAMP (92) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PALT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
PALT's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as RAMP (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PALT’s stock grew similarly to RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
RAMP's SMR Rating (90) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as PALT (92) in the null industry. This means that RAMP’s stock grew similarly to PALT’s over the last 12 months.
PALT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAMP (88) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PALT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
PALT's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as RAMP (14) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that PALT’s stock grew similarly to RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
PALT | RAMP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Advances ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago86% | about 1 month ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 2 months ago0% | about 2 months ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago0% | about 1 month ago0% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PALT and OTRK have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PALT and OTRK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PALT | 100% | -7.79% | ||
OTRK - PALT | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.87% | ||
RAMP - PALT | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
ALRM - PALT | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
INLX - PALT | 17% Poorly correlated | +2.31% | ||
WFCF - PALT | 12% Poorly correlated | +4.65% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RAMP has been loosely correlated with FROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RAMP jumps, then FROG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RAMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RAMP | 100% | -1.47% | ||
FROG - RAMP | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.12% | ||
BMBL - RAMP | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
DBD - RAMP | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.18% | ||
ACIW - RAMP | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
EGHT - RAMP | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
More |