It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAGS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMNI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMNI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PAGS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while RMNI (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.
PAGS is expected to report earnings on May 29, 2025.
RMNI is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
PAGS | RMNI | PAGS / RMNI | |
Capitalization | 4.57B | 301M | 1,517% |
EBITDA | 6.49B | 54.1M | 11,993% |
Gain YTD | 15.815 | 48.315 | 33% |
P/E Ratio | 13.72 | 11.56 | 119% |
Revenue | 8.89B | 431M | 2,063% |
Total Cash | 3.05B | 125M | 2,442% |
Total Debt | 193M | 81.7M | 236% |
PAGS | RMNI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RMNI's Valuation (50) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAGS (90) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RMNI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAGS’s over the last 12 months.
RMNI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PAGS (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that RMNI’s stock grew similarly to PAGS’s over the last 12 months.
PAGS's SMR Rating (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMNI (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PAGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMNI’s over the last 12 months.
PAGS's Price Growth Rating (91) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RMNI (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PAGS’s stock grew similarly to RMNI’s over the last 12 months.
PAGS's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as RMNI (99) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PAGS’s stock grew similarly to RMNI’s over the last 12 months.
PAGS | RMNI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago86% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago82% | 2 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 19 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAGS | 100% | -3.46% | ||
STNE - PAGS | 78% Closely correlated | -4.63% | ||
STEM - PAGS | 34% Loosely correlated | -9.27% | ||
PINC - PAGS | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
IMMR - PAGS | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.44% | ||
RMNI - PAGS | 32% Poorly correlated | +7.61% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RMNI has been loosely correlated with AVDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RMNI jumps, then AVDX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMNI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMNI | 100% | +7.61% | ||
AVDX - RMNI | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
RELY - RMNI | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.79% | ||
PAR - RMNI | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.91% | ||
CCCS - RMNI | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
CSGS - RMNI | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.23% | ||
More |