PAGP
Price
$18.87
Change
+$0.27 (+1.45%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.73B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMC
Price
$25.80
Change
+$0.67 (+2.67%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
316.36M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAGP vs SMC

Header iconPAGP vs SMC Comparison
Open Charts PAGP vs SMCBanner chart's image
Plains GP Holdings
Price$18.87
Change+$0.27 (+1.45%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization3.73B
Summit Midstream
Price$25.80
Change+$0.67 (+2.67%)
Volume$31.89K
Capitalization316.36M
PAGP vs SMC Comparison Chart in %
PAGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAGP vs. SMC commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAGP is a StrongBuy and SMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PAGP: $18.60 vs. SMC: $25.15)
Brand notoriety: PAGP: Notable vs. SMC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAGP: 41% vs. SMC: 15%
Market capitalization -- PAGP: $3.73B vs. SMC: $316.36M
PAGP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $3.73B. SMC’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $316.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $104.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAGP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAGP is a better buy in the long-term than SMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAGP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAGP is a better buy in the short-term than SMC.

Price Growth

PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.77% price change this week, while SMC (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAGP is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.87% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAGP($3.73B) has a higher market cap than SMC($316M). PAGP has higher P/E ratio than SMC: PAGP (24.83) vs SMC (5.74). PAGP YTD gains are higher at: 9.528 vs. SMC (-33.430). PAGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.64B vs. SMC (126M). SMC has less debt than PAGP: SMC (1.08B) vs PAGP (8.87B). PAGP has higher revenues than SMC: PAGP (47.8B) vs SMC (482M).
PAGPSMCPAGP / SMC
Capitalization3.73B316M1,182%
EBITDA2.64B126M2,097%
Gain YTD9.528-33.430-28%
P/E Ratio24.835.74432%
Revenue47.8B482M9,917%
Total CashN/A20.9M-
Total Debt8.87B1.08B825%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAGP vs SMC: Fundamental Ratings
PAGP
SMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
951
SMR RATING
1..100
7297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3823
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAGP's Valuation (12) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (49). This means that PAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (51). This means that PAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's SMR Rating (72) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as SMC (97). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to SMC’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as SMC (52). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to SMC’s over the last 12 months.

SMC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (38). This means that SMC’s stock grew similarly to PAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGPSMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNEVY4.53N/A
N/A
Fraser & Neave Ltd.
ISRJF0.12N/A
N/A
ReGen III Corp.
MCHVY23.55N/A
N/A
MGM China Holdings, Ltd.
TOELF197.95N/A
N/A
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
NMPRY5.00N/A
N/A
Navios Maritime Holdings, Inc.

PAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAGP
1D Price
Change %
PAGP100%
-0.31%
PAA - PAGP
97%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
OKE - PAGP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
ET - PAGP
72%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
EPD - PAGP
71%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
WES - PAGP
69%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
More

SMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMC has been loosely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMC jumps, then ET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMC
1D Price
Change %
SMC100%
-0.12%
ET - SMC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
PAA - SMC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
OKE - SMC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
PAGP - SMC
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
VNOM - SMC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
More