Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAGHX vs RWMFX
PAGHX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts PAGHX vs RWMFX
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth C
Price$118.93
Change+$0.92 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.38M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
PAGHX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAGHX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAGHX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. PAGHX (98.4M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than PAGHX: RWMFX (1.43) vs PAGHX (0.00). PAGHX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: PAGHX (9 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). PAGHX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. PAGHX (2.54). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAGHX: RWMFX (250) vs PAGHX (1000). PAGHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.62 vs. RWMFX (9.85). PAGHX return over 5 years is better than : 83.90 vs. RWMFX (51.83).
| PAGHX | RWMFX | PAGHX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.31 | 713% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.31 | 713% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.374 | 8.475 | 299% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.4M | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.62 | 9.85 | 463% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.43 | 30.71 | 334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.90 | 51.83 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement