PAG
Price
$183.68
Change
-$0.95 (-0.51%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.13B
48 days until earnings call
RUSHB
Price
$57.67
Change
+$0.09 (+0.16%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.46B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAG vs RUSHB

Header iconPAG vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$183.68
Change-$0.95 (-0.51%)
Volume$154.75K
Capitalization12.13B
Rush Enterprises
Price$57.67
Change+$0.09 (+0.16%)
Volume$30.19K
Capitalization4.46B
PAG vs RUSHB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. RUSHB commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Hold and RUSHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $183.68 vs. RUSHB: $57.67)
Brand notoriety: PAG and RUSHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 68% vs. RUSHB: 50%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $12.13B vs. RUSHB: $4.46B
PAG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $12.13B. RUSHB’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHB is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.20% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($12.1B) has a higher market cap than RUSHB($4.46B). RUSHB has higher P/E ratio than PAG: RUSHB (16.49) vs PAG (12.78). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 23.238 vs. RUSHB (6.997). RUSHB has less debt than PAG: RUSHB (1.75B) vs PAG (8.41B).
PAGRUSHBPAG / RUSHB
Capitalization12.1B4.46B272%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.2386.997332%
P/E Ratio12.7816.4978%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash155MN/A-
Total Debt8.41B1.75B480%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
412
SMR RATING
1..100
4957
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
27n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (31) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (12) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (47) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (43) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGRUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAFAX44.780.21
+0.47%
American Funds AMCAP 529A
COMSX29.930.11
+0.37%
DWS Digital Horizons S
FNKFX16.78N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6
LMVFX124.33-0.18
-0.14%
ClearBridge Value FI
GABPX50.31-0.20
-0.40%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income P

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.51%
AN - PAG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
GPI - PAG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
ABG - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
LAD - PAG
73%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
SAH - PAG
69%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
+0.16%
RUSHA - RUSHB
86%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
GPI - RUSHB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
AN - RUSHB
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
ABG - RUSHB
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
PAG - RUSHB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More