Advertisement
PAG vs RUSHB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Buy and RUSHB is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RUSHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RUSHB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.19% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.81% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| PAG | RUSHB | PAG / RUSHB | |
| Capitalization | 11.5B | 4.53B | 254% |
| EBITDA | 1.73B | 682M | 254% |
| Gain YTD | 16.683 | 8.388 | 199% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.10 | 16.64 | 73% |
| Revenue | 30.6B | 7.69B | 398% |
| Total Cash | 155M | 211M | 73% |
| Total Debt | 8.41B | 1.75B | 480% |
PAG | RUSHB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAG's Valuation (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (12) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
PAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (54) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (43) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.
| PAG | RUSHB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PXE | 29.99 | 0.58 | +1.97% |
| Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF | |||
| LIBD | 309.72 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF | |||
| FLQM | 56.42 | -0.22 | -0.38% |
| Franklin US Mid Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF | |||
| BBLU | 14.95 | -0.06 | -0.40% |
| EA Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF | |||
| AAPY | 23.86 | -0.11 | -0.46% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Apple ETF | |||
PAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.
RUSHB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | 100% | -0.97% | ||
| RUSHA - RUSHB | 86% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| GPI - RUSHB | 68% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| AN - RUSHB | 66% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ABG - RUSHB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| PAG - RUSHB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||