PAG
Price
$159.81
Change
-$0.93 (-0.58%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.52B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RUSHB
Price
$50.20
Change
-$1.36 (-2.64%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.75B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAG vs RUSHB

Header iconPAG vs RUSHB Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs RUSHBBanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$159.81
Change-$0.93 (-0.58%)
Volume$238.25K
Capitalization10.52B
Rush Enterprises
Price$50.20
Change-$1.36 (-2.64%)
Volume$20.21K
Capitalization3.75B
PAG vs RUSHB Comparison Chart in %
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. RUSHB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Buy and RUSHB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $160.74 vs. RUSHB: $51.56)
Brand notoriety: PAG and RUSHB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 101% vs. RUSHB: 33%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $10.52B vs. RUSHB: $3.75B
PAG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $10.52B. RUSHB’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $3.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $45.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RUSHB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHB.

Price Growth

PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +1.89% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.45% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.5B) has a higher market cap than RUSHB($3.75B). RUSHB has higher P/E ratio than PAG: RUSHB (14.97) vs PAG (11.25). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 7.847 vs. RUSHB (-4.339). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. RUSHB (682M). RUSHB has more cash in the bank: 211M vs. PAG (155M). RUSHB has less debt than PAG: RUSHB (1.75B) vs PAG (8.41B). PAG has higher revenues than RUSHB: PAG (30.6B) vs RUSHB (7.69B).
PAGRUSHBPAG / RUSHB
Capitalization10.5B3.75B280%
EBITDA1.73B682M254%
Gain YTD7.847-4.339-181%
P/E Ratio11.2514.9775%
Revenue30.6B7.69B398%
Total Cash155M211M73%
Total Debt8.41B1.75B480%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs RUSHB: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
RUSHB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5853
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
921
SMR RATING
1..100
4857
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6276
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5337
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHB's Valuation (31) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (33) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (21) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (76) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (53) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGRUSHB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISCB64.11-0.01
-0.02%
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
TMB25.72-0.02
-0.06%
Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF
NORW29.17-0.10
-0.34%
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
LFAW183.47-2.32
-1.25%
LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF
OIH284.30-10.18
-3.46%
VanEck Oil Services ETF

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+1.81%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
AN - PAG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
SAH - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
+2.83%
ABG - PAG
77%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
More

RUSHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHB
1D Price
Change %
RUSHB100%
-0.25%
RUSHA - RUSHB
84%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
GPI - RUSHB
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
AN - RUSHB
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
PAG - RUSHB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
ABG - RUSHB
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
More