PAG
Price
$174.83
Change
-$0.27 (-0.15%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
11.55B
72 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$55.16
Change
-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.29B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAG vs RUSHA

Header iconPAG vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts PAG vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Penske Automotive Group
Price$174.83
Change-$0.27 (-0.15%)
Volume$127.87K
Capitalization11.55B
Rush Enterprises
Price$55.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Volume$224.27K
Capitalization4.29B
PAG vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAG vs. RUSHA commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAG is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (PAG: $174.83 vs. RUSHA: $55.16)
Brand notoriety: PAG and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAG: 49% vs. RUSHA: 51%
Market capitalization -- PAG: $11.55B vs. RUSHA: $4.29B
PAG [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $11.55B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $47.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +3.94% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.18% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($11.5B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.29B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than PAG: RUSHA (15.72) vs PAG (12.17). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 16.454 vs. RUSHA (1.365). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. RUSHA (691M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. PAG (155M). RUSHA has less debt than PAG: RUSHA (1.73B) vs PAG (8.41B). PAG has higher revenues than RUSHA: PAG (30.6B) vs RUSHA (7.78B).
PAGRUSHAPAG / RUSHA
Capitalization11.5B4.29B268%
EBITDA1.73B691M251%
Gain YTD16.4541.3651,205%
P/E Ratio12.1715.7277%
Revenue30.6B7.78B393%
Total Cash155M229M68%
Total Debt8.41B1.73B486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
516
SMR RATING
1..100
4957
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4834
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (29) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (36) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (52) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as PAG (48) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCFGX16.240.10
+0.62%
BlackRock Capital Appreciation Inv C
LOGIX53.470.16
+0.30%
Scharf Institutional
LVOVX19.980.05
+0.25%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R6
AMPCX35.260.07
+0.20%
American Funds AMCAP C
SPMIX25.49N/A
N/A
Shelton S&P Midcap Index Investor

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.15%
AN - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
GPI - PAG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
ABG - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
LAD - PAG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
SAH - PAG
69%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-0.07%
RUSHB - RUSHA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
AN - RUSHA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
ABG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
GPI - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More