Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAFPX vs RBHTX
PAFPX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAFPX vs. RBHTX commentary
Dec 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAFPX is a Hold and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHTX has more cash in the bank: 43.9B vs. PAFPX (29.3M). PAFPX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: PAFPX (3.58) vs RBHTX (0.39). PAFPX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: PAFPX (5 years) vs RBHTX (19 years). PAFPX (3.06) is less costly to investors than RBHTX (1.46). PAFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RBHTX (5.00). PAFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBHTX: PAFPX (0) vs RBHTX (250). RBHTX (13.34) and PAFPX (12.74) have marching annual gain over last year. PAFPX (33.73) and RBHTX (33.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PAFPX | RBHTX | PAFPX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.06 | 1.46 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.384 | 19.578 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.3M | 43.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 0.39 | 910% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 13.34 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.22 | 43.87 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.73 | 33.02 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement