PAEKY
Price
$17.62
Change
+$1.96 (+12.52%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.94B
PUCCF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAEKY vs PUCCF

Header iconPAEKY vs PUCCF Comparison
Open Charts PAEKY vs PUCCFBanner chart's image
PT Aneka Tambang TBK
Price$17.62
Change+$1.96 (+12.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.94B
CAROLINA RUSH
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$28.5K
Capitalization3.85M
PAEKY vs PUCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAEKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAEKY vs. PUCCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAEKY is a Buy and PUCCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PAEKY: $15.75 vs. PUCCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: PAEKY and PUCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAEKY: 100% vs. PUCCF: 96%
Market capitalization -- PAEKY: $4.94B vs. PUCCF: $3.85M
PAEKY [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.94B. PUCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAEKY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePUCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAEKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAEKY is a better buy in the long-term than PUCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAEKY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUCCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAEKY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PUCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PUCCF is a better buy in the short-term than PAEKY.

Price Growth

PAEKY (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAEKY($4.94B) has a higher market cap than PUCCF($3.85M). PAEKY YTD gains are higher at: 137.787 vs. PUCCF (36.796).
PAEKYPUCCFPAEKY / PUCCF
Capitalization4.94B3.85M128,449%
EBITDAN/A-2.67M-
Gain YTD137.78736.796374%
P/E Ratio12.45N/A-
RevenueN/A3.86K-
Total CashN/A681K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAEKY vs PUCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PAEKY
PUCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4131
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
12100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5020

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAEKY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUCCF (93). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUCCF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUCCF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (51). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUCCF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAEKYPUCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAEKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBD14.340.33
+2.36%
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
IDLV33.970.21
+0.62%
Invesco S&P Intl Dev Low Vol ETF
DFNM47.710.17
+0.36%
Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF
CALI50.580.04
+0.08%
iShares Short-Term CA Muni Act ETF
DIVG32.28-0.03
-0.09%
Invesco S&P 500 Hi Div Grwrs ETF

PAEKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAEKY has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAEKY jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAEKY
1D Price
Change %
PAEKY100%
N/A
VITFF - PAEKY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMDRF - PAEKY
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ENDGF - PAEKY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - PAEKY
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
NSRPF - PAEKY
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.86%
More

PUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUCCF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUCCF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUCCF
1D Price
Change %
PUCCF100%
+9.17%
VITFF - PUCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - PUCCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.74%
PAEKY - PUCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - PUCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
PMCOF - PUCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.82%
More