PAEKY
Price
$17.62
Change
+$1.96 (+12.52%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.25B
PUCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAEKY vs PUCCF

Header iconPAEKY vs PUCCF Comparison
Open Charts PAEKY vs PUCCFBanner chart's image
PT Aneka Tambang TBK
Price$17.62
Change+$1.96 (+12.52%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.25B
CAROLINA RUSH
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$128.3K
Capitalization5.02M
PAEKY vs PUCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAEKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAEKY vs. PUCCF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAEKY is a Hold and PUCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (PAEKY: $16.69 vs. PUCCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PAEKY and PUCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAEKY: 68% vs. PUCCF: 637%
Market capitalization -- PAEKY: $3.25B vs. PUCCF: $5.02M
PAEKY [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.25B. PUCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAEKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePUCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAEKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAEKY is a better buy in the long-term than PUCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAEKY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUCCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAEKY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PUCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PAEKY and PUCCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PAEKY (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PUCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +16.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAEKY($3.25B) has a higher market cap than PUCCF($5.02M). PAEKY YTD gains are higher at: 137.787 vs. PUCCF (27.551). PAEKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.79T vs. PUCCF (-2.95M). PAEKY has higher revenues than PUCCF: PAEKY (47.78T) vs PUCCF (0).
PAEKYPUCCFPAEKY / PUCCF
Capitalization3.25B5.02M64,610%
EBITDA5.79T-2.95M-196,295,208%
Gain YTD137.78727.551500%
P/E Ratio12.02N/A-
Revenue47.78T0-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAEKY vs PUCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PAEKY
PUCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
10100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAEKY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUCCF (89). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUCCF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PUCCF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew significantly faster than PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (50). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAEKY's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that PAEKY’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAEKYPUCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAEKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PUCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHM50.570.74
+1.49%
Graham Corp
ZION51.480.08
+0.16%
Zions Bancorporation NA
LIN463.79-0.67
-0.14%
Linde plc
TWO10.62-0.08
-0.75%
Two Harbors Investment Corp
FAT2.36-0.02
-0.84%
FAT Brands

PAEKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAEKY has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAEKY jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAEKY
1D Price
Change %
PAEKY100%
N/A
VITFF - PAEKY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PDLMF - PAEKY
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMDRF - PAEKY
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ENDGF - PAEKY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - PAEKY
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
More

PUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUCCF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUCCF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUCCF
1D Price
Change %
PUCCF100%
N/A
VITFF - PUCCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - PUCCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
PAEKY - PUCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - PUCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - PUCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More