Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAECX vs RGNBX
PAECX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts PAECX vs RGNBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr C
Price$20.34
Change-$0.26 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$21.60
Change-$0.30 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.69B
PAECX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAECX vs. RGNBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAECX is a StrongBuy and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. PAECX (2.99B). PAECX pays higher dividends than RGNBX: PAECX (1.11) vs RGNBX (0.94). PAECX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: PAECX (31 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). PAECX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RGNBX (1.40). PAECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). PAECX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNBX: PAECX (0) vs RGNBX (250). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. PAECX (4.54). RGNBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. PAECX (28.03).
| PAECX | RGNBX | PAECX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.40 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.40 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.846 | 16.628 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 21.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.94 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.54 | 11.71 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.25 | 42.29 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 36.01 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.82 | 74.91 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement