Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PADEX vs RGNBX
PADEX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts PADEX vs RGNBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
Price$24.13
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.03B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$21.90
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.69B
PADEX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PADEX vs. RGNBX commentary
Nov 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PADEX is a StrongBuy and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. PADEX (3.03B). PADEX pays higher dividends than RGNBX: PADEX (1.80) vs RGNBX (0.94). PADEX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: PADEX (13 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PADEX (0.78). PADEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). PADEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNBX: PADEX (0) vs RGNBX (250). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. PADEX (6.85). PADEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.18 vs. RGNBX (36.01).
| PADEX | RGNBX | PADEX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.40 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.40 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.822 | 16.628 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.03B | 21.7B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.94 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 11.71 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.84 | 42.29 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.18 | 36.01 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.20 | 74.91 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers