Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PADEX vs RGNBX
PADEX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts PADEX vs RGNBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
Price$23.24
Change-$0.10 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.07B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$21.47
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
PADEX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PADEX vs. RGNBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PADEX is a Hold and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. PADEX (3.07B). PADEX pays higher dividends than RGNBX: PADEX (1.80) vs RGNBX (0.99). PADEX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: PADEX (14 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PADEX (0.78). PADEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). PADEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNBX: PADEX (0) vs RGNBX (250). PADEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. RGNBX (11.14). RGNBX return over 5 years is better than : 26.67 vs. PADEX (23.28).
| PADEX | RGNBX | PADEX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.40 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.40 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.019 | 1.898 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 21.9B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.99 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 11.14 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.63 | 40.24 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.28 | 26.67 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.64 | 87.40 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers