Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PADEX vs RBEGX
PADEX vs RBEGX Comparison
Open Charts PADEX vs RBEGX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
Price$23.24
Change-$0.10 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.07B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2E
Price$21.61
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
PADEX vs RBEGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PADEX vs. RBEGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PADEX is a Hold and RBEGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEGX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. PADEX (3.07B). PADEX pays higher dividends than RBEGX: PADEX (1.80) vs RBEGX (1.22). PADEX was incepted earlier than RBEGX: PADEX (14 years) vs RBEGX (11 years). RBEGX (1.14) is less costly to investors than PADEX (0.78). PADEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. RBEGX (10.00). PADEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEGX: PADEX (0) vs RBEGX (250). PADEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. RBEGX (11.46). RBEGX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. PADEX (23.28).
| PADEX | RBEGX | PADEX / RBEGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.019 | 1.934 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 21.9B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.22 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.28 | 11.46 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.63 | 41.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.28 | 28.18 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.64 | 89.87 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers