Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACRX vs PFIPX
PACRX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts PACRX vs PFIPX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R
Price$11.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets604.53M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
PACRX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACRX vs. PFIPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACRX is a StrongBuy and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. PACRX (605M). PACRX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: PACRX (3.44) vs PFIPX (2.49). PACRX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: PACRX (23 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). PFIPX (1.26) and PACRX (1.25) have similar cost to investors . PACRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PACRX (0) and PFIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACRX (8.46) and PFIPX (8.14) have marching annual gain over last year. PFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 10.23 vs. PACRX (9.29).
| PACRX | PFIPX | PACRX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.26 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.26 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.143 | 8.610 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 605M | 2.22B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 2.49 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.46 | 8.14 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.04 | 24.85 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.29 | 10.23 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.36 | 36.47 | 91% |